 |
|
Tuesday, October 05, 2004
Edwards explains, Cheney lies
The fact checkers are going to be all over Dick Cheney tomorrow, one lie after another.
Posted at 06:28 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
From Rude Pundit:
If, at tonight's "debate", when Edwards is asked, "How do you believe your career as a trial lawyer affects your approach to government?", he doesn't answer, "What the fuck kind of question is that, Gwen? What the fuck are you implying? Holy fuck, have you even looked at the cases I've tried? Doesn't the press do any actual goddamn research on, say, Lexis-Nexis or even fuckin' Google? Or maybe my fuckin' book? My legal career was based on helping individuals dicked over by the very kind of corporate and government culture this evil motherfucker across this stupid ass table has fostered. And don't you fuckin' gimme that stroke victim smirk, Dick, or I'll come across and start shovin' aluminum tubes up your ass, all 60,000 of 'em, one anodized tube at a goddamn time. Then, with all those tubes up your ass, you can tell me, tell all of us, if they feel like centrifuge tubes or just plain ol' rocket tubes. And then I'll shove yellow cake uranium from Niger up your ass. Then I'll shove the bones and blood of over 1000 Americans up your ass. And the bodies of tens of thousands of Iraqis, right up the motherfuckin' asshole, Dick, right on up. We'll follow that up with Energy Task Force documents, reams of 'em, get it, Dick? Gettin' reamed with reams? Then I'll shove Halliburton up your ass. I'll shove Kellog, shove Brown, shove Root, right up into your dessicated colon. I'll shove no-bid contracts and deferred compensation in there until your sphincter is aching and bloody. That's right, Dick, it's all goin' up there. Bribes to Nigeria and business with Iran. We're packin' it in, bitch. And let's go back, Gwen, let's get old school on this man whose heart is so small it needs a machine to make it pump, this vile, depraved political attack dog, this insider who massages the system to the benefit of his bastard cronies like a Korean hooker at a Japanese spa. Let's shove South African apartheid up Dick's ass. Let's shove water pollution, air pollution and other environmental degradation up Cheney's ass. Let's shove the bodies of women who will die of botched abortions if he gets his way up Cheney's ass. Let's shove the Project for a New American Century up Cheney's ass, along with Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Perle, and all the motherfuckin' neocons, pack 'em in, into Cheney's ass, alongside draft deferments, Lynne, SDI, and more. And when Cheney's cryin', yellin' that it hurts, his ass hurts, when he's weepin' and wonderin', 'Why? Why are you shoving all this up my ass?' I'll say, 'Because you've been shovin' it all up our asses for years, you vicious, soulless bastard. Now, stay bent over, 'cause, trust me, there's tons more shovin' to do and then I'm gonna fuck you Deliverance style, you corporate pig, so start practicin' your squealin'.' Does that answer your question, Gwen?", then the debate will be worthless.
Posted at 02:29 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
MISLEAD ABOUT HUSSEIN/ZARQAWI
CHENEY AND BUSH MISLEAD ABOUT HUSSEIN/ZARQAWI CONNECTION
Vice President Cheney and President Bush have repeatedly
claimed that al-Qaeda had a working relationship with Saddam
Hussein which justified the invasion of Iraq. The key piece
of evidence Cheney and President Bush have used to support
this claim was that Hussein harbored Abu Musab al Zarqawi -
a suspected associated of al-Qaeda. For example, on 6/21/04
Cheney said "Mr.
Zarqawi, who is in Baghdad today, is an al Qaeda associate
who took refuge in Baghdad, found sanctuary and safe harbor
there before we ever launched into Iraq."[1] President Bush
said on 6/15/04 "Zarqawi's the best evidence of a [Hussein]
connection to al Qaeda affiliates and al Qaeda."[2] One
problem: there is no evidence to support these claims.
Knight Ridder reports "a new CIA assessment undercuts the
White House claim that Saddam Hussein maintained ties to al
Qaeda, saying there is no conclusive evidence that the
regime harbored terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi."[3] According
to a senior U.S. intelligence official "The evidence is that
Saddam never gave Zarqawi anything."[4] Ironically, the
assessment was requested by Cheney.[5]
Sources:
1. "CNN Newsnight Aaron Brown," CNN, 06/21/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60800.
2. "Bush stands by al Qaeda, Saddam link," CNN, 6/15/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60801.
3. "Iraq-al Qaeda tie called unlikely," Miami Herald,
10/05/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60802.
4. Ibid,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60802.
5. Ibid,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60802.
Visit www.Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration
distortion.
Posted at 02:28 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
What a difference a week makes. Last Thursday, John Kerry took the stage and scored a decisive victory against George Bush. The momentum has shifted -- in nearly every public poll taken since the debate, we now are leading or tied.
In a tight race, things change very quickly -- this is why it is so important that we are always ready to act.
Last Thursday in Miami, I saw firsthand how hard the Bush campaign tried to spin the debate. They were searching for any angle. Our campaign, with your help, made sure the truth got out.
Tonight, we are organizing another national post-debate, rapid-response effort. Media Corps can set the pace. After the debate is finished, I will send all of you an e-mail that highlights the key differences in the debate. It is important that you take this information and help us get our message out to America.
John Edwards will face Dick Cheney in the vice-presidential debate tonight in Cleveland. Cheney is a superb debater and he has the format and rules that he wanted. However, he has to try and defend a record of failure. Bush and Cheney may have a failed administration, but they have an experienced campaign that will try hard to spin the debate. I am here in Cleveland right now to make sure that doesn't happen, but again I need your help.
It's time to step up for John Edwards. Please check your e-mail as soon as the debate ends.
Thank you,
Joe Lockhart
Senior Advisor
Posted at 12:38 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
It's frightening to contemplate, but before going to the polls next month, all Americans need to think about what just one more right-wing Justice on the Supreme Court will mean:
- George Bush being allowed to deny any citizen due process;
- Dick Cheney running a secret government accountable to no one; and,
- John Ashcroft grabbing more unchecked, unconstitutional powers.
As many of you may know, People For the American Way has been going all-out throughout this campaign season to avert those disasters by educating and activating progressive voters and activists nationwide.
And thanks to your help, we have made the Supreme Court a high priority issue for millions of Americans.
But our work is far from done.
Indeed, the next 30 days will be make-or-break time for this vital People For the American Way initiative.
So, I am counting on you to keep up the good work as Election Day nears - talk to your family, friends and neighbors about the vital role they can play in deciding who will appoint and approve nominees to the highest court in the land.
And I am calling on you to help People For the American Way do the same by rushing an especially generous contribution in support of all our work.
We have just a few weeks to prevent a complete right-wing takeover of the Supreme Court. With your help, People For the American Way activists, grassroots organizers and volunteers across the country will continue reaching out to voters until the last polling place closes and the rights of all Americans are protected from right-wing judges like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
No matter what voters think about specific issues, it's important that all recognize the critical significance of this election in determining and preserving the rights of all Americans.
We must make more of our fellow Americans aware of a fact you understand so well: It will take just one or two more Supreme Court Justices who share the views of Scalia and Thomas to start overturning more than 100 Court precedents dating back to the New Deal.
From the right to privacy that serves as the foundation of Roe v. Wade and every American's reproductive freedom, to the separation of church and state that keeps government out of religion (and vice-versa!), protection against discrimination in the workplace, courtrooms and voting booths, and bedrock environmental laws ...
... we could lose it all if anticipated Supreme Court vacancies are filled with far right ideologues.
That's the message we are bringing to voters nationwide through People For the American Way advertising campaigns ... outreach to reporters and newspaper editorial boards ... high-profile public events and rallies ... partnerships with other progressive organizations ... college campus mobilizations ... and online public education efforts at www.pfaw.org.
As you can imagine, sustaining all these efforts has put an enormous strain on our budget. And we will need to invest at least another $450,000 over the next 30 days to keep our momentum rolling all the way to Election Day.
That's why I urge you to support People For the American Way today.
In many states, voters are already having their say on the future of constitutional rights through mail-in and absentee ballots. But the vast majority of Americans won't vote until Election Day.
That makes right now our moment - our opportunity to stand up for everything we care about, all we believe in, and the American Way.
Please take your stand by supporting People For the American Way today.
Thank you,
Ralph G. Neas
President
Posted at 12:37 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
The Fight for 51 is not about one of us, it's about all of us.
It's about you. It's about me. It's about my fellow Democratic candidates from across the country. It's about restoring hope and opportunity for all Americans.
It's about rolling up our sleeves and working for the next 28 days to elect Democratic candidates from Alaska to Florida - candidates who share our vision and our abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation.
And nowhere are Democrats working harder to win back the Senate than at the DSCC. They're watching every race, every day, every hour to make sure that our message is heard, and that no Republican attack goes unanswered. But they need your help today!
Click here to contribute now.
Our message of hope and opportunity for everyone, of fighting for better paying jobs, of increasing access to health care, and of better schools must seen on TV and heard on the radio every day from now until Election Day.
Your donation will make this possible.
Your donation will turn a close second into a victory on Election Day.
Your donation will win the Fight for 51!
We can and will take back the Senate. Poll after poll shows Democratic candidates surging, but they need your help to put them over the top.
So today, if you feel the same energy that I do, if you feel the same urgency that I do, if you feel the same passion that I do, if you feel the same hopefulness that I do, turn those feelings into action and donate today!
Click here to contribute today.
And then on November 3rd, when 51 Democratic Senators prepare to be sworn into office, representing the one of the most talented and diverse groups of lawmakers in history, you'll know that you had a large part in making history.
Thank you for your support,
Barack Obama
Posted at 12:36 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Monday, October 04, 2004
Reject Patriot Act Expansion
House GOP Leaders Hijack 9/11 Commission Recommendations
Tell Your Representative to Reject PATRIOT Act Expansion and New Assaults on Civil Liberties
The 9/11 Commission made a thorough study of America's vulnerability to terrorist attack and made non-partisan recommendations for steps the United States could take to enhance our security.
Now House GOP leaders have hijacked the Commission's recommendations -- and, in some cases, disregarded them entirely -- to ram through nakedly partisan legislation which will undermine fundamental civil rights and civil liberties without providing greater security.
Call your U.S. House member today and urge the rejection of H.R. 10, the House 9/11 Commission bill.
Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
The 9/11 Commission's recommendations deserve careful consideration by Congress with a goal of bipartisan consensus on legislation that enhances safety and protects our fundamental freedoms. Call your representative today and explain that H.R. 10 violates that test and infringes on basic rights and liberties.
For example, H.R. 10 would:
-
result in the creation of a de facto national ID card and linked state motor vehicle databases with uncertain privacy protections;
-
codify the problematic "registered traveler" program developed by the Transportation Security Administration, which could allow terrorists to evade more rigorous screening and may result in unequal treatment of Americans on the basis of factors which have no relation to terrorism, such as credit score and employment or rental history;
-
allow greater use of secret electronic surveillance and secret searches; and,
-
significantly undermine fundamental due process and basic fairness in our immigration system by restricting redress for unfair, arbitrary or abusive deportations, and making it harder for victims of political persecution and torture abroad to make asylum claims.
H.R. 10's deeply partisan wedge-politics are not the American Way. Our security and civil liberties are too important to be sidelined by electoral politics. Call your U.S. Representative today at (202) 224-3121 to express your opposition to this legislation.
Posted at 10:27 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
America elects fewer women to Congress than the average country in sub-Saharan Africa.
It's not just countries like Sweden, New Zealand, and Argentina that elect twice the percentage of women. Among the 60-plus nations that elect a higher proportion of women than we do: Mozambique, Namibia and Botswana.
We have to support women running for office -- both incumbents and the leaders of tomorrow. Two women in particular have built grassroots campaigns that deserve your attention.
The first: Nancy Farmer, the challenger in the race for U.S. Senate in Missouri. She leads a common sense movement against an incumbent whose time has passed. Her opponent, Senator Kit Bond, is a relic -- he followed Jesse Helms in voting against the Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday. And he just voted against a minimum-wage increase while managing to hike his own salary to $158,000 a year.
Helms is long since retired -- and with your help Bond will be, too. Missouri elected Nancy Farmer as State Treasurer -- as Senator she will bring fiscal responsibility back to Washington. She has the right experience to solve real problems. Nancy Farmer is a rising star in a new generation of women leaders. She needs -- and deserves -- your help:
http://www.nancyfarmerforussenate.com/contribute.php
The other woman who has earned our support: Barbara Boxer. Senator Boxer fights the battles too many Democrats hide from. She helped give millions of low-income children access to quality health care. And she introduced a bill to give all Americans access to the same health care plan as Members of Congress.
In the words of the late Paul Wellstone, she is a fighter from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party. The values he fought for still live on with Barbara Boxer in the U.S. Senate. We need to keep her there. Please support Barbara Boxer now:
https://www.boxer2004.org/dfa/
Two weeks ago Democracy for America challenged all the Democratic Senate campaigns to demonstrate grassroots support. In response they rallied tens of thousands of their supporters. These two extraordinary women came out ahead of all the rest.
These candidates deserve to win because they will make better Senators than their opponents. But double standards and glass ceilings still exist in America. We have a long way to go -- but with your help, electing these two women will bring us closer to true equality.
Thank you.
Governor Howard Dean, M.D.
P.S. Want to help get out the vote for other great candidates in your area? Get to your final local DFA Meetup before the election this Wednesday at 7 PM: http://dfa.meetup.com
Posted at 08:41 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Mel Martinez lives in OKC?
"The Martinez strategy: Fewer issues, more dirt," Jim Defede, Miami Herald, 10/3/04
I was so ready to start off this week's rant with all of the gaffes in Mel Martinez's bid for the Senate--from what the St. Petersburg Times called a 'bigoted' primary campaign against Bill McCollum and blaming his staff for calling federal law enforcement agents 'armed thugs' to firing his campaign manager over the weekend. But, from time to time, you just have to let the press speak for themselves. So, here it is, in the words of Miami Herald columnist, Jim Defede:
In the hotly contested race for U.S. Senate, candidate Mel Martinez has stayed on the offensive, first against fellow Republican Bill McCollum and now against Democratic nominee Betty Castor. Since we expect more of the same in the final weeks leading to the Nov. 2 showdown, the following is how I imagine next week's strategy session will go between Martinez and his campaign staff.
Martinez: Good afternoon everyone. Where are we?
Staffer No. 1: Well, the polls are still very close. It's a dead heat between you and Betty Castor.
Martinez: OK, any ideas?
Staffer No. 2: We could try debating her on the issues.
Martinez: Issues! Are you crazy? No, what we need to do is slime her just like we did Bill McCollum in the primary.
Staffer No. 1: Are you sure you want to go negative, sir?
Martinez: Oh, I'm not going to go negative. You guys are. This week, Danny and Tom will issue statements suggesting the reason Castor supports stem cell research is because she has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's and that she is mentally incompetent to be a senator.
Staffer No. 2: Is that true, sir? Does she have Alzheimer's?
Martinez: Of course not. But once you guys say it, some nitwit's going to believe it. And if the media goes nuts and blasts us for being insensitive, I'll step in, act disgusted by your assertions and repudiate you as a couple of ''young turks.'' But even after I distance myself from your remarks, some people will still believe Castor is sick. This is going to be great.
Staffer No. 1: I'm sorry, sir. There is only one problem. You can't call Danny and Tom ''young turks'' because you already called Pete and Bobby ''young turks'' after you had them accuse McCollum of being in bed with the "radical homosexual lobby.''
Martinez: Darn it! [Pause in conversation. Martinez can be heard talking to himself.] Think, Mel, think. I got it! We'll call them overzealous.
Staffer No. 1: Nope. We used that one for the guys at the ad agency that produced the commercial labeling McCollum "antifamily.''
Martinez: OK, how about rogue staffers? You guys wouldn't mind being rogue staffers would you?
Staffer No. 1: No, sorry sir, you called Carlos and Hector rogue staffers after they issued that news release you wrote for the Spanish-language radio stations calling the federal agents who seized Elián González "armed thugs.''
Martinez: Well-intentioned but misguided?
Staffer No. 2: That's what you said about Sandy and Diane after they said Castor was an accomplished thespian in college.
Martinez: Renegade? I don't remember condemning anyone on my staff for being a renegade.
Staffer No. 1: Well, we were saving renegade for the commercials suggesting Castor may have been a founding member of al Qaeda.
Martinez: [Sounding annoyed.] Look people, I can't do this on my own. I need your help. I realize none of you like being repudiated. Do you think I like repudiating you? I don't. But I made it very clear from the beginning that this campaign was going to be based on one simple theme: plausible deniability. I can't get elected if people are going to hold me accountable for the mean and nasty things we're doing. My only hope is to blame each and every one of you.
Staffer No. 2: You're right, sir. And, I think I speak for everyone in this room when I say we are all honored to be the kindling in the bonfire of your vanity.
Martinez: OK, I have no idea what you just said. Sounds like homosexualist talk to me, but nevertheless if it was an apology, I accept it. Now let's get back to the hard work of this campaign. Remember, the mud isn't going to sling itself people. In the meantime, get me a thesaurus because for the next 30 days I'm going to repudiate each and every one of you like my life depended on it.
Other Florida newspapers agree: "Martinez's tactics raise troubling questions about his character and leadership." (Tampa Tribune, September 2, 2004). And an even longer list of Mel's mishaps can be found on the Palm Beach Post website.
If Mel can't be held accountable for what happens in his own campaign, how can Floridians trust him to be held accountable in the Senate? Will he blame constituents for his votes? Distance himself from Senate floor statements after making them? Click here to see the latest ad from Betty Castor, entitled "Shoes," that asks, "can we believe anything he says?"
While Mel has been preoccupied with blaming and firing his staff members, Betty Castor has been busy reaching out to voters, campaigning on the issues and fundraising. You can see why the St. Petersburg Times endorsed Betty Castor over the weekend, declaring, "In the race to replace retiring U.S. Sen. Bob Graham, one candidate brings a reassuring resume and the other an identity crisis." Ouch. Told you makeovers usually don't last. You can read the full endorsement by clicking here.
Nethercutt from Nether Nether Land--Far Right and Farther from the Truth
What kind of politician would use Osama bin Laden and images of 9/11 to get elected? None other than Republican Senate candidate, George Nethercutt running in Washington state. He is so behind in the polls that he released a TV ad linking Senator Patty Murray to Osama bin Laden--during the very week she was fighting to increase homeland security on the Senate floor!
"False" "slanders" is what newspapers call Nethercutt's attacks against Senator Murray (Seattle PI, August 31, 2004). The ad was so outrageous, the Seattle Times wrote, "The George Nethercutt for U.S. Senate campaign should yank a sleazy attack ad running on TV stations in our state. The ad insults the intelligence of Washington voters." (Seattle Times, October 1, 2004). Just like his fellow far-right Republican Senate candidates, Martinez, Coburn, Keyes and Coors, George Nethercutt "will do anything to be in office." (Seattle Times, September 2, 2004).
But Senator Murray came out with a new ad in response to Nethercutt and the latest polls show his desperate and dishonest attacks are failing--badly. Murray's lead against Nethercutt has actually widened in recent days. She now runs 17 points ahead of Nethercutt. Click here to view Senator Murray's latest ad.
"Maybe It's Good for Pete Coors, But It's Bad for Colorado"
You have to see the DSCC's new ad exposing the truth behind Pete Coors' record as a businessman--click here to view the ad entitled "Headlines." Coors is running for the Senate as a job creator. Well, I can see why. He's real good at creating jobs. Just not for Americans. And he's all for tax cuts, too... in the form of tax breaks for millionaires like himself. After all, this is a man who has justified his vow to fight any attempt to "tax the rich" by claiming, "I don't think there's anything wrong with being self-serving." (Rocky Mountain News, September 18, 2004).
And he wants more of the tax breaks George W. Bush handed to him and other corporate friends on a silver platter. The additional tax cuts Coors proposes for the rich will save him another $670,000 on his tax bill. How does he expect to pay for these irresponsible and unaffordable tax breaks in a time of war and a historic budget deficit--both started by his own party? The same way he cut himself a break as CEO of Coors Brewing Company.
When he needed to finance his fat executive bonus, he went on a cost-trimming, job-cutting, outsourcing spree. At the same time he was laying off hundreds of Colorado workers, he applied to hire scores of foreign workers for jobs paying as much as $135,298 a year. (Rocky Mountain News, September 28, 2004). His company repeatedly violated environmental regulations, and was fined for it by the US Environmental Protection Agency. But those fines were a drop in the bucket compared with the bottom line benefits he was swimming in. So, his company remains the third-largest source of water pollution in the state.
Bitter Vitter Puts Himself Above Louisiana Issues, Maybe Even Above the Law
Last week, I ranted about how David Vitter was placing the interests of corporate crunch above the issues at stake in the Louisiana Senate race. This week, he puts personal ambition and party politics above the issues affecting ordinary Louisianians. As reported by The Advocate,
"The three Democratic contenders for U.S. Senate all mention issues when asked to point to one thing they will do if elected that will help Louisiana the most. But for U.S. Rep. David Vitter, the lone Republican in the race, it's a different story. Just his presence in the Senate would open all kinds of possibilities, Vitter replied when asked to name his top issue." (The Advocate, September 30, 2004).
Considering he decided to keep $10,000 in political contributions from indicted officials at Tom Delay's PAC, Americans for a Republican Majority, Bitter Vitter thinks he's above the law, too. If he doesn't listen to voters and doesn't listen to federal judges, who does he listen to? His party--he voted with them 96% of the time in Congress.
Driving Home the Point in Oklahoma
What will Oklahoma City residents see on their way home from work? A new billboard that displays Republican Tom Coburn's now infamous quote, "You have a bunch of crapheads in Oklahoma City," and calls on Coburn to apologize for this inflammatory remark. Click here to view the billboard.

All of us following the Oklahoma Senate race have been hearing one offensive remark after another coming out of Tom Coburn. Yesterday, the rest of the nation got to know this far-right Republican:
"Oklahoma's Senate candidates faced off on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday, with... Republican Tom Coburn, a former House member, invoking John F. Kennedy's name and suggesting as 'evil' a $442 billion budget deficit brought on by a GOP Congress and administration...
Carson, a former Rhodes scholar, stuck closely to his strategy of painting Coburn as a 'gadfly' with a propensity to make off-the-wall comments, and whose voting record indicates he cares more about his ideology than supporting projects for Oklahoma." (Washington Post, October 4, 2004).
And Coburn reiterated his stance on the death penalty for abortion providers:
MR. RUSSERT: You would outlaw all abortion.
DR. COBURN: Except to save the life of the mother. I would think that every created life has value.
MR. RUSSERT: If a doctor performed an abortion in violation of that law, he should be subject to the death...
DR. COBURN: Well, I think whatever we decide should be the subject as a country, if in fact it's violating the law. I know it's not violating the law today. But it grieves my heart every time that we terminate.
MR. RUSSERT: But if you had your way, Doctor, and this is important, you would have a law banning all abortions, and if a doctor violated that law, he or she should be put to death.
DR. COBURN: He or she should be put to the penalties that we think, as a society--today, in many states, we don't have the death penalty. In other states, we do. Whatever that is, but I believe that we have to stick on the side of life. I think...
MR. RUSSERT: But you think the death penalty would be an appropriate penalty in that situation.
DR. COBURN: If somebody intentionally takes life at any stage throughout the country, except to save a life, and that's innocent life, I think we have to use the law that's on the books to respond to that. I sure do.
Remember Coburn, Oklahomans know this Senate race isn't a "battle of good versus evil," as you believe, but a battle of ideas. That's why the most recent Daily Oklahoman poll now shows Carson leading by 5 points--a dramatic reverse from last month when Coburn held a 9-point lead. (Daily Oklahoman, September 27, 2004).
Above the Law in Ohio, Too
Republicans are running so scared in Ohio that Secretary of State Ken Blackwell is threatening to disqualify voter registration cards that are not printed on 80 pound stock paper. What the *#@!? That's right. Ohio residents who failed to weigh the paper their voter registration form was printed on will have to re-submit their applications. But the deadline to register in Ohio is... today. That means thousands of Ohio voters will not have the time to re-apply and will therefore be denied the right to vote in this critical battleground state.
This a clear violation of US Voting Rights Codes that state, "No person acting under color of law shall... deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote in such election."
As usual, the Republicans believe they are above the law. Their creative engineering of the polls is painfully familiar to all of us. And, just like their far-right Senate candidates, they export election tricks across state borders almost as fast as Pete Coors exports Colorado jobs!
DSCC Supporters: Clicking Away to Victory
In case you missed my victory lap around the DSCC office last week, let me thank all of our supporters again for pushing the DSCC online war chest to above the $1.3 million mark at the close of the 3rd quarter. You helped exceed our target of $1 million, and political observers are taking notice. Roll Call wrote, "In both South Carolina and Oklahoma, the two Republicans held leads in the high single digits prior to the DSCC spending. The races are now within a few points."
Take a look at how your contribution is making all the difference in the most hotly contested Senate races:
"The DSCC has been on the air with independent expenditures since Aug. 19, a move widely credited with revitalizing the campaign of state Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum (D), which had been floundering for several months.
'With the DSCC being the only outside money in the race for two months, it has allowed our opponent to stay in the game when she otherwise would have been through,' said Terry Sullivan, campaign manager for Rep. Jim DeMint (R).
A similar situation has been playing out in the Oklahoma race between Rep. Brad Carson (D) and former Rep. Tom Coburn (R). There, the DSCC began running independent-expenditure ads just after Labor Day, hammering Coburn with $533,000 worth of ads before the NRSC has even placed its first buy." (Roll Call, September 28, 2004).
"Democratic prospects have improved in two states: Oklahoma and South Carolina... A Democrat win there would change the party's prospects at retaking the Senate." (Stuart Rothenberg; Roll Call, October 1, 2004).
The Hotline's analysis now places us at 50 seats in the Senate. Thanks to all of your support, 51 is within clear reach. Stay tuned--only 29 days more to go! And don't forget to watch tomorrow's Vice Presidential debate at 9pm EST. Because it's not just the next Vice President of the United States we'll be watching, but the next tie-breaker in the Senate, as well.
Scary Stats of the Week
The Supreme Court is back in session today so I thought it was appropriate to remind you of a few key, scary numbers:
- 5-4 razor thin margins have decided the most important Supreme Court decisions on issues like women's rights, privacy rights, and civil rights.
- 4 out of the 9 Supreme Court justices over the age of 70.
- 10 years since the last Supreme Court retirement--the longest period since 1823 that we've ever gone without a vacancy.
- 2 or 3 justices that will likely be appointed by the next President of the United States.
- 1 new justice is all the Republicans need to overturn Roe v. Wade.
- 51 Democratic Senators is what it will take to block nominations of another conservative Bush Administration.
Republican Blooper of the Week
"I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged." (Justice Antonin Scalia; Harvard Crimson, September 29, 2004). No further comment necessary from this mother of two.
Actually, Stop Ranting, and Start Acting: Things YOU Can do to Win Back the Majority
The election is fast approaching, folks. Your action today will make the difference between 49 and 51 Democratic seats this November!! We are looking for help with Get Out the Vote (GOTV), legal and fundraising efforts across the country – especially in our key states of South Dakota, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Colorado and North Carolina. A successful GOTV effort is crucial to our goal of taking back the majority in the US Senate. We are interested in volunteers for a day, 4 days, a week - it does not matter. We will assist with housing and other logistics. Being a part of an effective statewide campaign is an extremely rewarding experience, one that you will never forget. Please contact Steve Heuer at Heuer@dscc.org or 202-224-2447 if you are able to help in the push to regain the majority!! You can also contact the following volunteer coordinators on our campaigns:
What's your Weekly Rant?
We want to hear from you! Sign up and Log on to FromtheRoots.Org to post your own comments.
Best Regards,

Anne Holy Cow we're going to win Lewis
Posted at 08:21 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
RICE MISLEADS AGAIN ON IRAQ'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM
The New York Times revealed yesterday that top
administration officials grossly mislead the public about Iraq's
supposed nuclear weapons program.[1] The government's top nuclear
scientists said that the aluminum tubes Iraq had acquired
were "too heavy, too narrow and too long" for use in
creating nuclear weapons.[2] They were perfectly suited, however,
for use in Iraq's existing legal rockets.[3] Meanwhile,
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice went on CNN before
the invasion of Iraq and said the tubes "are only really
suited for nuclear weapons programs."[4]
In October 2003, David Kay - the administration's
handpicked weapons inspector - concluded, "We have not uncovered
evidence that Iraq undertook significant post-1998 steps to
actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile
material."[5] Stunningly, appearing on talk shows yesterday morning,
Rice continued to insist that Iraq may have been pursuing
nuclear weapons and that the aluminum tubes may have been
involved in that process. On ABC's "This Week" Rice said, "As
I understand it, people are still debating this."[6] David
Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and
International Security, said Rice "is being disingenuous, and
just departing from any effort to find the truth."[7]
Sources:
1. "How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms
Intelligence," New York Times, 10/03/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60492 .
2. Ibid.,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60492 .
3. Ibid.,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60492 .
4. "Ritter Meets With Iraqi Leaders," CNN, 9/08/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60493.
5. "Statement by David Kay ," CIA, 10/02/03,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60494.
6. "Rice: Iraqi nuclear plans unclear," MSNBC, 10/03/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60495.
7. Ibid.,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=60495 .
Visit www.Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration
distortion.
Posted at 04:02 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
|
|
|
 |
|
 |