 |
|
Friday, October 15, 2004
BUSH MISLEADS ON OSAMA BIN LADEN
At last night's debate President Bush claimed that,
contrary to Sen. John Kerry's assertion, he never said he was "not
that concerned" about Osama Bin Laden. Bush chastised Kerry
saying, "Gosh, I don't think I ever said I'm not worried
about Osama bin Laden. That's kind of one of those
exaggerations."[1] Bush was completely wrong.
At March 13, 2002 press conference, Bush said "So I don't
know where he [Osama Bin Laden] is. You know, I just don't
spend that much time on him...I truly am not that concerned
about him."[2] Watch the video of Bush's remarks:
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=62685
Sources:
1. "Transcript of Debate Between Bush and Kerry, With
Domestic Policy the Topic," New York Times, 10/13/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=62686.
2. "President Bush Holds Press Conference," The White
House, 3/13/02,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=62687.
Visit www.Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration
distortion.>>
Posted at 12:35 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
You've heard us say for months that ACT is building "the largest voter mobilization effort in history" but we've kept quiet on the details... until now.
With Election Day just 19 days off, it's time to let you inside our strategy to elect Democrats to federal, state and local elections.
With your help, we've done much more than just talk about building the largest field campaign in history -- we've done it. And now you can help unleash it on Election Day.
$1200 sponsors a GOTV staging area in the battleground states (we'll have hundreds of them.)
$136.68 rents a van to shuttle canvassers and voters on Election Day (we need more than 1200 vans in Florida alone!)
$75 pays the expenses of an Election Day canvasser (we will have 45,000!)
Please make your secure online contribution here.
Just last week, paid ACT canvassers logged over 60,000 hours of targeted door-to-door canvassing. And it's working! Thanks to a recent test here in Wisconsin, we have a preview of what's to come:
Last month, during the Wisconsin congressional primary (September 18th), ACT-WI targeted 70,000 households in a base Democratic areas near Milwaukee. 800 ACT staff and volunteers canvassed the area intensively for 36 hours, knocking on the door of each Democratic household twice.
The result? Unprecedented turnout in a Wisconsin Congressional Primary! For only the second time in Milwaukee's history, African American turnout exceeded white turnout.
There's no secret here. We're encouraging people to think about the issues and exercise their right to vote. This is how we'll defeat George W. Bush and elect Democratic leadership in federal, state and local elections here in Wisconsin and around the country. But it can't be done without your support.
Please help fund ACT's Election Day operations today.
There is no more effective way to contribute to Democratic victories than by giving to ACT in these final days. Each dollar you can give will be put directly to work in the specific precincts where votes are needed most.
And we need you on the ground, too. I encourage you to come work with us in a battleground state this weekend and in the days ahead. Join thousands who have already signed up to volunteer in a battleground state here .
Thank you for everything you've done and everything you will do in the days ahead.
Sincerely,
Tamara Pogue
State Director
ACT-Wisconsin
PS: Read more about our plan in this week's Time Magazine http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101041018/nmehlman.html and help put it in action by contributing any amount you can give.
Posted at 12:34 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Rights of Gays and Lesbians
| The Rights of Gays and Lesbians On the Line |
|
ELECTION 2004 19 DAYS AWAY
"Imagine a Supreme Court with one, two, or three additional Scalias. With a Scalia-Thomas majority on the Supreme Court, marriage equality would be a distant hope, and a return to other forms of institutionalized discrimination would be an imminent threat."
-- Ralph G. Neas, president of People For the American Way in The Advocate this week - read the full article here.
Dear Friends:
The future of the Supreme Court is hanging in the balance this November. With your help, our education campaign is in full swing.
The candidates are talking - during the presidential debates:
President George W. Bush: said last Friday he will appoint "people that would be strict constructionists" -- coded language for the states'-rights extremists who want to reverse decades of social justice progress and return to a 19th century approach to the Constitution.
Senator John Kerry: said yesterday, "I'm not going to appoint a judge to the Court who's going to undo a constitutional right, whether it's the First Amendment, or the Fifth Amendment, or some other right that's given under our courts today -- under the Constitution. And I believe that the right of choice is a constitutional right."
One of these men will appoint one, two, or even three justices to the Supreme Court. Is this November's election for four more years, or 40 more years?
Voters are taking action. Hundreds of activists around the country have requested organizing kits. In just four days, you've raised over $20,000 to run ads in swing states -click here to help us reach our goal. Our experts are talking to journalists daily about the future of the Court. To join the effort, visit our 2004 Supreme Court Online Headquarters:
http://www.pfaw.org/go/four_or_forty/
This November, vote to protect a Supreme Court that will protect you.
Threats to the Rights of Gays and Lesbians
This week in 1979, over 500,000 people converged in Washington D.C. for the first major gay and lesbian civil rights march on the capital. The Court remains vitally important in the fight for equal rights. Your vote for President in November will help decide the rights of lesbians and gay men for the next 40 years or more.
-
One or two more justices like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas on the Court would revive the infamous Bowers v. Hardwick ruling allowing states to treat gay men and lesbians as criminals. They would also likely reverse the landmark holding in Lawrence v. Texas that all adults, including gay men and lesbians, are entitled to privacy with respect to private sexual conduct by consenting adults.
-
More right-wing justices on the Court would further threaten the First Amendment rights of gay artists and performers against anti-gay censorship. Also, after a federal employee was fired after revealing he was gay, Justice Scalia argued that the employee should not even be able to have a court consider his constitutional claims.
Click here to read more about threats to the rights of gays and lesbians
Whatever your views on these specific issues, it's clear that the next President will help determine gay rights for decades. Urge your friends and neighbors to think carefully about the Supreme Court when they vote in November.
Vote Like Your Rights Depend on It. They do.
PS. Supreme Court Organizing Kits are still available. Click here to request yours! |
Posted at 12:33 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
As you know, this Friday, the Democratic Party is facing another critical fundraising deadline. I know from experience the importance of this deadline because it is when strategists need to make key decisions about battleground states like Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, and about all our key races.
https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html
In 2000, my campaign had to make excruciatingly difficult decisions on allocating our resources to the most winnable states. We knew the final margin would be razor thin, but we had to pick and choose which states we could afford to saturate with TV ads during the final drive to Election Day.
We were forced by the limitations of our campaign funding to make a series of tough choices -- including a decision to go for it in Florida and scale back in Ohio. If we had been able to pay for a full TV ad campaign in all of the key battleground states, we might not have lost Ohio by a thin margin. And of course, even though I think we won Florida, well, you know what happened there.
So don't let this happen again -- contribute now.
https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html
In these closing weeks, let's make sure that the Democratic Party has the resources to go all out for John Kerry and the Democratic ticket in Florida and Ohio and Pennsylvania and Michigan and elsewhere. Your contribution right now will make sure the Party has the ability to compete in every single battleground state.
Right now, party strategists are making those tough, last-minute decisions about where to spend resources. With your help, this time the Supreme Court will not pick the next president, and the current president will not pick the next Supreme Court.
https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html
You've put George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the Republican attack machine on the run. In these final weeks, they can't win a fair fight -- and you, the members of the Democratic Party's amazing online community, have the ability to make it a fair fight. Please respond as quickly as you can.
Then on November 2, we'll be celebrating our victories up and down the ballot in Ohio and Florida and other battleground states across the nation -- and not only in the popular vote, but in the electoral college too.
On to victory,

Al Gore
Posted at 12:32 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Last week you demanded honesty about the draft--and people heard you. Cable news channels and major newspapers have been buzzing about the draft since you signed the petition. Last night's moderator at the Presidential debate even raised this question once again.
Other organizations also heard--and are following your lead. MoveOn and a group called Win Back Respect produced a TV ad about this issue. Over a million young people will see this ad on The Daily Show, MTV, and ESPN.
You can add to this momentum even more--tell some friends about the draft petition you signed:
www.democracyforamerica.com/SpreadNoDraft
We still have work to do getting our message out. The mainstream media coverage has focused on unsubstantiated rumors of some "secret plan" for a draft. They are missing the point.
It's not about a secret plan--we are concerned about a draft because, when it comes to meeting all of the military commitments he has made, George Bush has no plan.
He says he will "stay the course". But if we stay the course with this president, he will face a choice: drastically reduce our commitments or reinstate the draft. Ask your friends to join you in asking which one he will choose:
www.democracyforamerica.com/SpreadNoDraft
We see the results of his failed leadership. He chose not to bring meaningful allied help into Iraq. He allowed al Qaeda, North Korea, and Iran to become more dangerous. And he has left our homeland unprotected by sending the National Guard to Iraq. George Bush says he has no plans to reinstate the draft--but his reckless decisions may leave no choice.
A quiet draft has already begun--and it is no secret. Active duty soldiers who finish their commitments are being forced to stay on. We have begun calling up forces like the Individual Ready Reserves, consisting of older reservists who have not been on active duty and have not trained for some time. And there's no end in sight.
Americans need the facts. Inform your friends and ask them to sign the petition so that together we can demand the honesty we deserve.
Thank you,
Governor Howard Dean, M.D.
P.S. Here's what some of you are saying about the draft:
"As a young American who cares deeply about my country, I deserve to know if a draft will be put into effect. If not, how do you plan to fill the troop commitments necessary for success?"
--Ajay N.
"I have heard so many things over the years from politicians that have not been true that I no longer take anything for granted. I don't see how the country can continue under the present commitments of our armed forces with a complete volunteer military. If the intention is to bring back the draft I would like to know now and not after the presidential election. An informed voter is an intelligent voter."
--Charles M.
"Staying the course means we're going to need more troops in our go-it-alone strategy. How will we get them?"
--Carl T.
"A feasible, realistic plan needs to developed, shared with the American public and put in place to bring peace in Iraq and end American occupation of the territory. Can this be done without instituting a military draft? The American people want to know before the 2004 presidential election."
--Sharon S.
"Our forces are stretched thin and the situation in Iraq is getting worse. We will no doubt be there a long time and other troubles lurk on the horizon. Be honest with America and tell us how we are going to do this without the draft."
--Phil S.
"My wife and I have deep concerns about this issue. We've been through the Vietnam years and saw how the draft split this country in half. We don't want to have to relive our worst nightmares, not with our sons."
--Lance K.
"A straight and clear answer, please."
--Janice M.
Ask someone you know to speak out: www.democracyforamerica.com/SpreadNoDraft
Posted at 12:31 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
In July it was Michigan.
Last week it was Ohio.1
Today it's Milwaukee!2
We must protect democracy wherever forces attempt to suppress and disenfranchise voters.
Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker today denied Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett's request for additional ballots for use on November 2.
After receiving only 679,000 ballots -- less than the city was given in 2000 and 2002 -- Milwaukee's mayor, expecting major turnout in this election, asked the County Executive for more ballots. "No way," said the county, telling the Associated Press that election-fraud "'chaos' could occur at understaffed polling places where voters could grab ballots."
We cannot allow the County Executive to deny Milwaukee voters their right to cast a ballot on Election Day.
The stakes have never been higher and people will do almost anything to influence the outcome.
Sign the petition - insist that Walker provide the ballots Milwaukee needs to ensure a fair election!
http://www.pfaw.org/go/letmilwaukeevote
Posted at 12:31 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
AP Story:
Bush said in the second presidential debate that there would be no revival of the military draft under any circumstances if he is re-elected. "We're not going to have a draft, period," the president said.
However, Kerry told The Des Moines Register, "With George Bush (news - web sites), the plan for Iraq is more of the same and the great potential of a draft." The interview was published Friday as Kerry was leaving for Wisconsin and a speech on the economy.
Bush said in the second presidential debate that there would be no revival of the military draft under any circumstances if he is re-elected. "We're not going to have a draft, period," the president said.
However, Kerry told The Des Moines Register, "With George Bush (news - web sites), the plan for Iraq is more of the same and the great potential of a draft." The interview was published Friday as Kerry was leaving for Wisconsin and a speech on the economy.
Posted at 12:29 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Posted at 09:34 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Chris Bowers:
George Bush repeatedly talks about the need to spread freedom around the world. However, here at home, his own campaign has engaged in a nationwide effort to keep people from casting votes. Across the country, in important swing state after important swing state, Republicans want to reduce the number of people who vote in the upcoming election:
In Colorado, they do not want you to vote.
In Florida, they do not want you to vote.
In Minnesota, the do not want you to vote.
In Nevada, they do not want you to vote.
In Ohio, they do not want you to vote.
In Oregon, they do not want you to vote.
In Pennsylvania, they do not want you to vote.
In West Virginia, they do not want you to vote.
In Wisconsin, they do not want you to vote.
By contrast, Democrats have worked tirelessly to register as many new voters as possible and increase national participation in the political process nationwide. In state after state, Democrats have registered tens of thousands more new voters than Republicans. One party wants you to vote; one party does not. This is something voters need to know.
Don't fall for it, Compare | Decide | Vote November 2nd at www.comparedecidevote.com
Posted at 08:54 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
ROCK THE VOTE
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Republican Party Chairman Tells Us To Stop Talking About The Draft" name=109779237957217297>
Yesterday, Rock the Vote received a very startling letter from Ed Gillespie, Chairman of the Republican National Committee. He demanded that we stop talking about the issue of the military draft.
The letter leaked out on the Internet and a lot of people wondered whether it was even real. Yes, it is real.
The letter from Chairman Gillespie is here. Our response is here and below.
---------------------
October 14, 2004
Mr. Ed Gillespie, Chairman
Republican National Committee
310 First Street, SE
Washington, DC 20003
VIA FASCIMILE: (202) 863-8774
Dear Chairman Gillespie,
The letter I received from you yesterday was quite a surprise. It struck us as just the sort of "malicious political deception" that is likely to increase voter cynicism and decrease the youth vote. In fact, it is a textbook case of attempted censorship, very much in line with those that triggered our organization's founding some fifteen years ago.
I am stunned that you would say that the issue of the military draft is an "urban myth"that has been "thoroughly debunked by no less than the President of the United States."
I have some news for you. Just because President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary Rumsfeld, and for that matter Senator Kerry, say that there is not going to be a draft does not make it so. Just because Congress holds a transparently phony vote against the draft does not mean there isn't going to be one. Anyone who thinks that the youth of America are going to take a politician's word on this topic is living on another planet.
By your logic, there should be no debate about anything that you disagree with. There's a place for that kind of sentiment (and your threats), but its not here in our country.
There are questions that the politicians are running away from. How long can we keep 138,000 U.S. troops or more on the ground in Iraq? What if full-scale civil war erupts there, as the CIA has warned is a realistic possibility? Would the next President be faced with a choice of pulling out of Iraq rather than institute a draft? Would women be drafted? What exactly would the draft-age be?
According to the Pentagon's own internal assessment, there are "inadequate total numbers" of troops to meet U.S. security interests. The current issue of Time magazine reports that, "General John Keane, who retired last year as the Army's No. 2 officer, says the continued success of the all-volunteer military is not guaranteed" Keane has told Congress that adding more than 50,000 troops to the Army would require thinking about a return to the draft."
But you want young people to believe that the draft is just an "urban myth." I was expecting that you were going to present some facts to back up your assertion. But, instead, you have demanded that we stop talking about it.
Although the draft may not be a discussion topic for someone of your age, we have found that young people - Republicans, Democrats and Independents - are very interested in this issue. We believe in the capacity of young Americans to make their own judgments when fairly presented with the facts. That is why we are actively promoting an informed, educated dialogue. I urge you to review the "Debunking the Myths" section on our website where we address misperceptions about the draft.
Mr. Gillespie, this is a generational issue. Nothing cuts closer to the core of the very reason Rock the Vote exists. We think young people deserve to know where the politicians stand on this issue - and that a generation that could be called to service deserves more than the phony debate they are getting. We believe that it is only by asking questions - not by censoring debate - that our democracy can remain strong and vital.
Issues such as jobs, health care, Iraq, taxes, and education have energized the electorate, and the draft issue deserves the same serious treatment and candor. Blanket denials do not square with the facts and do not level with the electorate.
As far as the possibility that Rock the Vote's efforts might "decrease the youth vote," we are feeling very confident at this point that the opposite is true. More than 1.1 million people have used our website to fill out voter registration forms this election cycle. Our street teams and ground partners have registered hundreds of thousands more. Young voters are going to surge at the polls on Election Day and make the difference for whichever candidate does the best job reaching out to them.
Despite the strong and often strident tone of your letter, I would hope that we could both agree that honest and open debate is the surest guarantor of our democracy and liberty.
Sincerely,
Jehmu S. Greene
President
:: posted by hans @ 3:19 PM
http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2004_10_10_archive.html#109779237957217297
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
The draft issue is more than rumors on the Internet(s).
As the media begins to actually dig into an issue that it has largely ignored throughout the year, awareness is growing that, regardless of political unpopularity, the draft deserves more attention.
Check out this new Time magazine piece for a very comprehensive overview of the draft issue from all sides. Everyone from draft-age young men and women to experienced military experts see, at the very least, that a draft is indeed a possibility.
The article brings up a Pentagon fallback plan to increase the financial incentives for enlisting, with some rewards reaching as high as $40,000 for special-op fighters. Realistically, that seems like where we are headed.
This is a good example of something that we think needs public discussion in this presidential race. How long could we keep up incentive-based recruiting? And at what point does fairness come into play? To put it bluntly, are these really “volunteers” in the sense of the word that both candidates use on the stump, that the military leaders use in the press conferences?
Do yourself a favor and read the Time magazine article.
:: posted by Matt Teper @ 8:24 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2004
Rock the Vote Draft Campaign Garners National Attention" name=109746281217818319>
Check out this great LA Times article about our campaign to make sure all young voters are educated about the possibility of a draft. Looks like the right people are starting to take notice ...
THE RACE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE
Rumor of a Draft Touches a Nerve. Bush and Kerry deny conscription plans, but Rock the Vote raises the specter.
By Kathleen Hennessey Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON — An army of new voters received a startling call to serve recently, when one of the largest nonpartisan groups trying to increase voting by young people sent fake draft cards to nearly 640,000 e-mail addresses.
"You've been drafted" was the subject line of the message sent by Rock the Vote. The message contained an image of a draft card addressed to the recipient and warned, "real cards may be in the mail soon if the situation doesn't improve."
President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry both have rejected suggestions that they would move to reinstitute the draft, positions they reiterated in their debate Friday night in St. Louis.
But by raising the threat of the draft, Rock the Vote has staked its claim as the edgiest of the multimillion-dollar campaigns trying to push young people to the polls. The effort has also caught the attention of Republicans, who said the group misled voters and crossed into partisan politics. "
It has the face of a nonpartisan group, yet it's promoting the agenda of the liberal left," said Alison Aikele, spokeswoman for the College Republican National Committee. Aikele said has she received complaints from local chapters about draft rumors on campus.
Rock the Vote political director Hans Riemer said the group was trying to inform its members about the limits of U.S. military forces, not persuade them to vote for a particular candidate.
"It would be crazy if young people went to the polls and didn't factor this into their votes, however they come down on it. It's very real," said Riemer. "We're one major military conflict away from the draft. I don't see why candidates get to talk about war all day long and we can't talk about a draft."
Despite the stated opposition by Bush and Kerry to reinstating the draft, a recent survey found that only a quarter of young people knew this, compared with 42% of older people.
About half of 18- to 29-year-olds believe that Bush wants to reinstate the draft, according the poll conducted by the Annenberg National Election Survey this month.
Last week, House Republicans sought to dispel suggestions that the war in Iraq could lead to a new draft by hastily bringing the idea to a vote and defeating it in a 402-2 vote.
But that move is unlikely to end the talk on college campuses.
"If there is a draft, I would still be eligible," said University of Michigan student Paul Indyck, explaining why he was leaning toward Kerry.
Posted at 08:51 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
|
|
|
 |
|
 |