Blogswarm - Online Political News Magazine



Thursday, October 07, 2004
We've got Kerry's Back

The other day, after a rally in Ohio, a woman asked someone from our campaign to deliver a message to me. She said, "Senator Kerry, we've got your back." That is certainly the feeling I have as you and hundreds of thousands of others keep pouring your hearts and souls into winning this election. That support inspires me as I prepare for tomorrow's debate with George W. Bush.

Yesterday, Mary Beth Cahill wrote to you explaining our October strategy -- and asked you to help raise $5 million for the Democratic Party before the first critical deadline arrives at midnight tomorrow.

https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html

I have a message for that woman in Ohio, for you, and for all Americans struggling to build a better life for their families: I have your back, too. We are going to bring back good jobs, bring back opportunity, and bring back the promise that has kept hope in the hearts of the American people for generations.

For the last four years, George Bush has favored the wealthy and well-connected, and turned a blind eye to the devastating impact of his policies on America's families. As evidence of his failures piles up all around him, George Bush refuses to budge. The only thing he has to offer is more of the same.

George Bush is the first president since Herbert Hoover to lose jobs on his watch -- and they say it is time to celebrate. Wages are falling, medical bills are rising, and families cannot send their kids to college -- and the Republicans tell us "Hey, don't worry, this is the best economy of our lifetime." When it comes to the struggles our families are facing, George Bush just does not get it.

We already know what four more years of a Bush administration will look like. Every choice they have made has been to give more to those with the most, while telling everyone else you are on your own. That is their view and that is their plan for the next four years.

But that is not our plan. And it does not have to be our future. In less than thirty days, we have the chance to change all of this. You can have a president who has your back -- but I need you to make the difference this month.

https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html

Thank you,

John Kerry

John Kerry


Posted at 12:45 pm by blog swarm
 

Win Back Seats in the House!

John Kerry and John Edwards are surging in the polls, and our campaign to take back our country has never been stronger. Now, thanks to their performance in the first two debates, we have a real shot not just at winning the White House, but at recapturing control of the Senate, and winning back key seats in the U.S. House.

After watching crucial votes like the Bush Administration's terrible Medicare Reform Bill pass by a margin of just five votes in the U.S. House, we know every seat we can wrestle from the control of the House Republican leadership is essential. We've got to seize the moment and ride this wave.

Five great Congressional candidates are poised to win their races. We can help put them over the top. Check them out and give what you can now, at:

https://www.moveonpac.org/give/04endorsed.html

Melissa Bean, a progressive businesswoman, has won nationwide support for her campaign to oust Phil Crane, one of the most entrenched and most conservative members of the House. In Congress since 1969, Crane has played a key part in President Bush's slashing of social programs though giant tax cuts for the very rich. Melissa Bean has a real chance to show Crane the door, with our help.

Patsy Keever is an outstanding candidate from North Carolina who worked for twenty-five years as a public school teacher and is now serving in her third term as a popular county commissioner. Her Republican opponent, Charles Taylor, votes with his party's right-wing leadership 96% of the time. Taylor has been implicated in a bank loan scandal, and has had his Congressional wages garnished because he failed to pay taxes. All this from one of the wealthiest members of Congress. Let's help Patsy Keever "clean House."

Allyson Schwartz and Joe Driscoll are both running strong campaigns for two open House seats in Pennsylvania. Open seats are rare but crucial pickup opportunities in this age of gerrymandering, and Schwartz and Driscoll are making the most of them.

Schwartz has been a long-time, key progressive leader in Pennsylvania, serving for fourteen years as a state senator. Driscoll has been a prominent community leader and business person in his district, the Lehigh Valley. Both of their Republican opponents support President Bush's war in Iraq, more tax cuts for the wealthy, and pretty much the whole right-wing agenda. Driscoll's opponent is also attacking him for seeking MoveOn's support. Let's show them we mean business.

Finally, Teresa Daly is a committed City Councilor who decided to run for Congress because her Republican Congressman and the Bush Administration were out of touch. Daly is running against John Kline, who gained his seat through an ugly and wildly distorted smear campaign two years ago. Since then, Kline's been one of Bush's staunchest supporters. Let's replace him with someone who will champion our values instead.

You can help support these 5 great candidates now, at:

https://www.moveonpac.org/give/04endorsed.html

Kerry's and Edwards' surge is creating "coattails" -- making it more likely that these 5 Democrats (and others) will win as well. It's a huge opportunity, and a crucial one for us to make the most of.

Thanks to Kerry and Edwards fighting hard, and our hard work, we have a real chance to win this election, but we've got to win back Congress as well -- we have to take back our democracy from Tom DeLay as well as from George Bush.

Together, we can do it. If we can raise at least $50,000 for each of these 5 candidates, that could mean an additional week of television, more grassroots ground troops for the final days, or several mailings to targeted voters across their districts.

Our support can make the difference in these key races.

Please give what you can, whether it's $10, $50, or $100, now:

https://www.moveonpac.org/give/04endorsed.html

Thank you, again, for all you do.

Sincerely,

--Hannah Pingree
  MoveOn PAC
  October 7th, 2004

Authorized by:
Committee to Elect Patsy Keever
Melissa Bean for Congress
Allyson Schwartz for Congress
Daly for Congress
Driscoll for Congress
PAID FOR BY MOVEON PAC


Posted at 10:36 am by blog swarm
 

We won't be fooled

They've used lies, misrepresentations, threats and fear to tear down Democrats this election season.  Now, incredibly, the campaign weapon being brandished by the Republicans is the Holy Bible itself.  If ever there were one book that should never be used for political gain, if ever there were one book that should never be the subject of lies and deception, it is the Bible. 
 
Yet, that is exactly what the Republican National Committee (RNC) is doing with a mailing sent to voters in my state of West Virginia.  The flyer claims that Democrats are out to ban the Bible.  You heard me, the Bible.  And they sent it to voters in Arkansas, too. 
 
This flat-out, no-doubt-about-it, silly, sophomoric charge is part of a nationwide pattern in Republican National Committee politics to use any means necessary-even the Bible-to win elections.  If the RNC is willing to go that far in West Virginia, imagine how far they'd go elsewhere. These smear tactics are happening in our Senate races across the nation.

What is their basis to determine which party is for the Bible and which is against, or for whom Christ would vote?  It is a crass insult to people and to their faith.
 
Will you stand for that? Charges that Democrats would ban the Bible? I know I won't! That's why I am standing with the DSCC. They're the only ones watching every Senate race, every hour to make sure Democratic candidates across the country have the resources they need to fight back against this kind of shameless Republican smear.

Please make a contribution to the DSCC today so that we can put an end to this kind of Republican National Committee fear mongering. Click here to contribute now.

 
Do they think the people of my state are a bunch of gullible, ignorant country bumpkins?  Voters in West Virginia are smart enough to see right through the false garbage peddled by high-priced Republican National Committee consultants.  And that goes for voters in every other state in the union.  America will not be fooled. 
 
Because Democrats know that the Bible would never be banned.  And I know it because I know the Constitution.  It says that the First Amendment, not a political party, protects the Bible: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."  The Republican National Committee hacks should pick up the Constitution and read it sometime.  They should read the Ninth Commandment of the Bible too, "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor."  What could be more false than telling voters that the Bible would be banned if non-Republicans are elected to office?
 
Help put a stop to the false witness, false claims and false ads being spewed by the Republican national party. Contribute to the DSCC today because in these next 26 days, Democratic candidates in every key race will need every dollar to expose the truth behind these Republican attacks. We're just 2 seats away from a majority and the Republicans are clearly getting desperate. Join us in the Fight for 51-the polls say we can do it.

Click here to contribute to the DSCC today.

Sincerely,

Senator Robert Byrd

P.S. To learn more about the Republican smear tactics on Senate races across the nation, click here.


Posted at 10:35 am by blog swarm
 

Putting Poison Pills Before National Security

Putting Poison Pills Before National Security

October 7, 2004

House Parties Round 3 With Al Gore!
Vice President Al Gore believes Democrats will win this November, and he wants to tell you why. You are cordially invited to join Vice President Gore and Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi for the next Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Majority Party on Sunday, October 24.
http://www.MajorityParties.com

Register to host a party at http://www.MajorityParties.com to gain access to an historic, nationwide conference call with Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi on October 24 and you will also receive a party host kit - with everything you need to make your party a success. Plus, the first 100 hosts to raise $100 online, will receive the DCCC's limited edition "Clean House: vote Democrat in '04" t-shirt. http://www.MajorityParties.com


Putting Poison Pills Before National Security

When House Leadership inserts unnecessary and divisive amendments into what should be bipartisan bills, hoping that the opposing party will be forced to vote against a measure they otherwise support, that's called a "poison pill." When the Republicans inserted a provision into the Homeland Security bill in 2002 that stripped all of our homeland security workers of their labor rights, that was a poison pill, and the Republicans cynically exploited it throughout that election - even going so far as to accuse veteran and triple amputee Max Cleland of being "soft on defense." And as this Washington Post editorial points out, they are trying to do it all over again:

"THE HOUSE OF Representatives' version of intelligence reform might be dismissed as an election-year stunt were it not so dangerous. The bill does not differ from the Senate's version merely on how much to empower a new director of national intelligence, a subject about which reasonable minds can differ. It also burdens the entire project with a grab bag of controversial changes in security policy. Some provisions -- criminalizing terrorist hoaxes, enhancing penalties for obstruction of justice in terrorism cases -- are relatively insignificant election-year posturing. But many, like the bill's broad new deportation powers, are egregious. One section would relax restrictions on deporting people who may face torture at home, in violation of an international treaty to which this country is a party. Other sections, authorizing new surveillance powers in terrorism cases and changing the definition of criminal support for terrorist groups, may have merit but involve complex and highly controversial policy changes that warrant debate.

"The goal here is not subtle, nor does the Republican leadership even make a pretense of concealing it. The goal is to force Democrats either to accept policy they would otherwise oppose or to turn against the bill itself -- thereby letting Republicans brand them as weak on terrorism, as they did with legislation to create the Department of Homeland Security during congressional elections two years ago...

"What's more, there is considerable danger that some of these provisions will become law. The House is due to take up the intelligence reform bill this week and is likely to pass it with many of the most offensive provisions intact. It will then go to a House-Senate conference committee to be reconciled with a far sparer, bipartisan Senate version. Anything can happen there. Even for a House Republican leadership eager to make Democrats squirm on the campaign trail, playing politics with intelligence reform should not be worth the potential damage."

One of the most egregious provisions is one legalizing what's called "extraordinary rendition" - the practice of deporting merely suspected terrorists to foreign nations for interrogations involving torture. The American Bar Association released this statement:

"The American Bar Association objects strongly to the inclusion of provisions authorizing 'extraordinary rendition' in the House leadership's bill that purports to implement the 9/11 Commission recommendations. These provisions would permit secretly transferring terrorist suspects to foreign countries known to use torture in interrogating prisoners. Extraordinary rendition not only violates all basic humanitarian and human rights standards, but violates U.S. treaty obligations which make clear that the U.S. government cannot avoid its obligations under international law by having other nations conduct unlawful interrogations in its stead. This practice not only violates our own cherished principles as a nation but also works to undermine our moral leadership in the eyes of the rest of the world."

Playing politics not only with our national security, but with torture as well. Congressional leadership could hardly fall any further.

"Closed, For Business"

The Boston Globe this week took on the formidable challenge of documenting the disgrace Congress has become under GOP Leadership with a three part series on GOP corruption, influence peddling, and abuse of power.

Part 1: GOP flexing its majority power

"With one party controlling the White House and both chambers of Congress, and having little fear of retaliation by the opposing party, the House leadership is changing the way laws are made in America, favoring secrecy and speed over open debate and negotiation. Longstanding rules and practices are ignored. Committees more often meet in secret. Members are less able to make changes to legislation on the House floor. Bills come up for votes so quickly that elected officials frequently don't know what's in them. And there is less time to discuss proposed laws before they come up for a vote."

Part 2: Energy bill a corporate triumph

"Intended to lay out an energy policy for the nation for the first time in more than a decade, the energy bill became a cash bonanza for corporate interests in and out of the energy arena…

"A Globe analysis of tens of thousands of pages of lobbying records shows that entities with a stated interest in energy policy spent $387,830,286 lobbying Washington last year. They also paid tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions to officials putting together the package at the White House and on Capitol Hill.

"The Globe analysis shows that the corporations and others, including some universities, were rewarded in the bill with tax breaks, construction projects, and easements of regulations that would save them much more than they spent making their arguments to the government."

Part 3: Medicare bill a study in D.C. spoils system

"What once began as a proposal for $253 billion in drug coverage for seniors four years ago grew to a $400 billion grab bag for a broad spectrum of players in the health-care economy. The staggering costs rose yet another 33 percent when the Bush administration unveiled an estimate this year that it had kept quiet during the 2003 debate over Medicare: $534 billion."

All just a day in the life of Tom DeLay...


Under Ethics Fire, DeLay Dodges, Donors Disperse...

On Friday night GOP Leader Tom DeLay received his second rebuke from the House ethics committee. As it happened, the extensive report also solved the long-running mystery of who threatened and bribed Republican Nick Smith over his vote on the sham GOP Medicare bill. As the Washington Post put it in an editorial:

"Another surprise -- or maybe not, come to think of it -- was that House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), who hadn't previously surfaced in the Smith matter, turned out to be involved in the mess."

But as the New York Times notes, this egregious violation may well be only the beginning...

""Representative Tom DeLay, the majority leader rebuked by House ethics officials for pressuring a fellow member to switch his vote on a health care bill, still faces potentially more serious accusations, subjecting him to a new scrutiny that even some Republicans say could complicate his political future.

"Mr. DeLay, the take-no-prisoners Texan known for maintaining strict discipline in his caucus, is entangled in a series of inquiries here and in Texas regarding his fund-raising and other activities. In Texas, three of his top aides have been indicted; in Washington, the House ethics panel is deciding whether to initiate a formal investigation.

"On Friday, Republicans publicly rallied around their leader, though some said privately that the surprise ethics rebuke on Thursday - the second for Mr. DeLay, who was previously chastised for pressuring interest groups to hire Republicans - could hinder the leader if he tried to become speaker...

"'There are a lot of folks who want to see that happen, and they're a little depressed right now,' one said."

What a pity - we can probably guess who those people are. The Dallas Morning News elaborates:

"Pressure mounted last week for a full-scale investigation of Majority Leader Tom DeLay, after the House ethics panel issued a rare public admonishment because he tried to trade political favors for a lawmaker's vote on the GOP Medicare drug plan.

"'The ethical cloud surrounding Tom DeLay has quickly grown into a thunderstorm,' said Rep. Chris Bell, the freshman Houston Democrat who has a separate ethics complaint pending against Mr. DeLay, R-Sugar Land. 'The stench of corruption emanating from Mr. DeLay and his associates has become too pungent to ignore any longer, even in Washington.'"

Indeed, rumors are circulating that DeLay may ultimately be finished. And a recent incident in which DeLay had to cravenly dodge a group of protesters can only be taken as an indication that he is feeling the heat. But in perhaps an even better sign of his eventual, or even imminent demise, the corporate donors who have made him who he is are suddenly closing their pocketbooks:

"And the 22-month investigation that led to the indictments has made campaign donors squeamish, activists and lobbyists say.

"'People are a little nervous,' said consultant Royal Masset, who has several GOP House clients. 'They're not sure who to give to. And if they do, they certainly don't want Ronnie Earle sniffing around.'"

Is it getting hot in here? If you need more DeLay nitty-gritty, by the way, Salon.com also has an excerpt from the hotly anticipated DeLay biographay, "The Hammer" - well worth a read.


Races to Watch: Sullivan Ready to Pounce in CT-02

A new poll in Connecticut's 2nd district finds what is essentially a dead heat, with Democratic challenger Jim Sullivan trailing by a mere 4 points behind faux-moderate Republican Rob Simmons. But the details of the poll hold the key to a race that has been on everybody's radar screen from the beginning:

"Voters favor Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry over Bush by 19 percentage points, the poll showed.

"'This is not about people not liking Simmons. This is about many people in the second district voting on the basis of George Bush, and George Bush in the second district is running way behind,' said poll director Ken Dautrich. 'Simmons happens to be a Republican, and he's being punished for that.'"

OBut it's much more than the fact that he "happens to be a Republican." Simmons has voted with Tom DeLay on his extreme agenda a full 88% of time - that's sharing a lot more than a party moniker, and the DCCC pounced with a new ad described in this DCCC press release:

"The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee today released a new television ad airing in Connecticut's 2nd Congressional district. The ad exposes Rep. Rob 'W' Simmons' record of rubberstamp support for President Bush's special interest agenda, including the failed Bush economic policies, tax cuts for millionaires, the loss of nearly 50,000 jobs in Connecticut, and a failure to uphold workers rights'...

"'Voters should know that a vote for Rob Simmons is a vote for the agenda of George Bush: failed economic policies, huge tax cuts for millionaires and no support for workers. That's an agenda working families in the 2nd district can no longer afford,' said Robert T. Matsui, DCCC Chairman. 'We won't let Congressman Simmons run from his record of voting to rubberstamp the agenda of George Bush and extreme Republicans in Congress. His record may make him popular with GOP leaders in Washington, but it's hurting workers and families in Connecticut.'"

Faux-moderate rubberstamps like Simmons can expect that kind of treatment across the country. Make a contribution today to help us hold them accountable on the road to Speaker Pelosi.


Races to Watch: Dead Heat in NM-01

Albuquerque Journal:

"Democrat Richard Romero has pulled to within a point of incumbent Republican Heather Wilson in the race for New Mexico's 1st Congressional District, according to a Journal poll.

"...A month ago, Wilson had a 49-43 edge over Romero."

Indeed, Jimmy Carter himself penned an op-ed for the Washington Post decrying the "repetition of the problems of 2000" in Florida's voting system, and even he singled out Harris (and her successor) for rebuke:

"In Florida's 2000 election mess, Katherine Harris served simultaneously as Florida's secretary of state and as co-chairwoman of the state's Bush-Cheney campaign committee. In her official capacity, she repeatedly took actions that favored the campaign. This year has turned out to be more of the same. When Gov. Jeb Bush appointed Ms. Hood as secretary of state, he chose someone with a history of partisanship, as a Republican officeholder and as a Bush-Cheney elector in 2000. Now Ms. Hood's politics appear to be influencing her election duties."

An excellent recent article documented how Romero is running a textbook anti-rubberstamp campaign, pounding Wilson for everything she hoped would go under the radar. How much of a rubberstamp is she, you might ask: 93% of roll call votes went with DeLay. And here was George Bush praising her top two acheivements in Congress:

"Heather also understands the need to have fairness when it comes to Medicare. And she is going to take a leadership role in helping to provide prescription drug coverage within the Medicare system...'

"There's a lot more issues that we could talk about where Heather has taken a leadership role, but I do want to talk about one more, and that is energy."

Brian M. Riedl of the Heritage Foundation, your response?

"The Medicare and energy bills, although experiencing different fates, share one common denominator: little reform at huge cost, while loaded with special-interest spending."

As for our man Romero, he's spent 35 years serving New Mexico. He represents the 12th district in the State Senate and serves as the Senate President Pro Tempore. Prior to serving in the State Senate, Romero was a science teacher, principal and assistant superintendent in the Albuquerque public schools. In 1968 and 1969, Romero served in Korea on active duty in the Air Force. Furthermore, the district was carried handily by both Richardson and Gore, so it's ripe for the picking.

Pay Romero a visit.


News From the Blog

Massive Reality Check
A new report weapons report describes Hussein as "diminishing threat."

Pelosi: 'John Edwards Is Clear Winner in Tonight's Debate'
Another couple of DeLay deputies in hot water.

Two Things to Remember
The first installment of our "live-blogging" of the Veep debate.

Big Surprise
The Republicans scuttle attempts to close corporate tax loopholes.

Laughable
Republicans support increasing whistleblower protections?

Dirty Details
The lowdown on how the Medicare vote bribery happened


Posted at 09:51 am by blog swarm
 

Stop Bush's Draft

George Bush is not being straight with the American people about the draft. He promised in the first presidential debate to win the war on terror with "an all-volunteer army". He has already violated that commitment.

The truth is that a draft has already begun -- it just hasn't affected most of our families yet. Active duty soldiers who finish their commitments are being forced to stay in. And the flagrant misuse of the National Guard and Reserves has ripped apart families by sending unprecedented numbers of them to occupy a foreign country.

Because of George Bush's failure to lead the world, we are nearly alone in Iraq. If we "stay the course" with this president, he will face a choice: drastically reduce our commitments or reinstate the draft. Sign the petition demanding that he tell Americans which one he will choose:

http://www.democracyforamerica.com/nodraft

George Bush chose to go to war without substantial help from our allies. He has badly over-committed our armed forces. One of the Joint Chiefs and his own administrator in Iraq have both said that we will need tens of thousands more troops to stabilize Iraq. Extreme measures are already being taken to meet the shortfall -- and the president has an obligation to explain how he will meet our commitments without drafting young people into service.

Fathers from New York who joined the Reserves to guard America against another attack have been sent to Iraq. Teenagers in the Florida National Guard who expected to provide hurricane relief in their home state have been forced to fight halfway around the world.

George Bush has left our homeland unprotected. And his plans to move existing forces away from threats like North Korea put our interests and our allies in danger. This cannot continue. Sign this petition demanding honesty -- we will deliver it to the White House:

http://www.democracyforamerica.com/nodraft

Family friends helped a young George Bush dodge the draft. Dick Cheney didn't fight because he had, in his words, "other priorities" -- he got five deferments. We cannot afford to let them dodge the question of a draft now.

Will they force a new generation of young people to make the sacrifices they refused to make? Or will they leave us unprotected at home and in other dangerous parts of the world?

I have a son in college. My family and millions of other families could be affected by a draft. We deserve to know before we vote in November how George Bush and Dick Cheney plan to prevent one. Sign the petition now:

http://www.democracyforamerica.com/nodraft

Just recently a frightened Congress voted down a bill calling for a draft. (After all, they need to get re-elected in a few weeks.) But the way they rejected the bill showed just how easy calling a draft would be -- they suspended normal rules and voted with almost no warning. Authorizing a draft would be just as easy -- it could be done in less than 48 hours.

We have been misled about this war from the beginning. They said Iraq had nuclear weapons -- that was false. They said the whole war would cost a few billion dollars -- in reality, we spend several billion dollars every month. They say things are getting better -- but every month brings more casualties than the last.

Now they say we won't need a draft. We cannot afford to take their word for it.

Governor Howard Dean, M.D.

P.S. Please forward this message to your friends. We will only get the truth if we all stand up and demand it.


Posted at 09:50 am by blog swarm
 

Bush lies on WMD

BUSH CONTINUES TO MISLEAD ON WMD

In the lead up to war, President Bush argued that America
must invade Iraq because it possessed weapons of mass
destruction. For example, on 9/28/02 President Bush said, "the
Iraqi regime possesses biological and chemical weapons."[1]
On 10/7/02, President Bush said, "Iraq is reconstituting its
nuclear weapons program."[2] Long after it became clear
that there were no stockpiles of WMD in Iraq, President Bush
has continued to insist that before the invasion "Iraq was a
gathering threat."[3]

A comprehensive 1000-page report to be released today by
the Bush administration's handpicked weapons inspector,
Charles A. Duelfer, will reveal "Saddam Hussein posed a
diminishing threat at the time the United States invaded and did
not possess, or have concrete plans to develop, nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons" according to the Washington
Post.[4] According to Duelfer's report, U.N. sanctions
prevented Hussein from reconstituting his weapons programs.[5]

Sources:

1. "Radio Address by the President to the Nation," The
White House, 09/28/02,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=61151.
2. "President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat," The White House,
10/07/02,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=61152.
3. "Remarks by the President at Victory 2004 Rally," The
White House, 09/16/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=61153.
4. Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat, Washington Post,
10/06/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=61154.
5. Ibid,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=2131193&l=61154.

Visit www.Misleader.org for more about Bush Administration
distortion.

Posted at 09:49 am by blog swarm
 




Wednesday, October 06, 2004
Bush destroyed economy

From Maxspeaks:

Open Letter to President George W. Bush

October 4, 2004

Dear Mr. President:

As professors of economics and business, we are concerned that U.S. economic policy has taken a dangerous turn under your stewardship. Nearly every major economic indicator has deteriorated since you took office in January 2001. Real GDP growth during your term is the lowest of any presidential term in recent memory. Total non-farm employment has contracted and the unemployment rate has increased. Bankruptcies are up sharply, as is our dependence on foreign capital to finance an exploding current account deficit. All three major stock indexes are lower now than at the time of your inauguration. The percentage of Americans in poverty has increased, real median income has declined, and income inequality has grown.

The data make clear that your policy of slashing taxes – primarily for those at the upper reaches of the income distribution – has not worked. The fiscal reversal that has taken place under your leadership is so extreme that it would have been unimaginable just a few years ago. The federal budget surplus of over $200 billion that we enjoyed in the year 2000 has disappeared, and we are now facing a massive annual deficit of over $400 billion. In fact, if transfers from the Social Security trust fund are excluded, the federal deficit is even worse – well in excess of a half a trillion dollars this year alone. Although some members of your administration have suggested that the mountain of new debt accumulated on your watch is mainly the consequence of 9-11 and the war on terror, budget experts know that this is simply false. Your economic policies have played a significant role in driving this fiscal collapse. And the economic proposals you have suggested for a potential second term – from diverting Social Security contributions into private accounts to making the recent tax cuts permanent – only promise to exacerbate the crisis by further narrowing the federal revenue base.

These sorts of deficits crowd out private investment and are politically addictive. They also place a heavy burden on monetary policy – and create additional pressure for higher interest rates – by stoking inflationary expectations. If your economic advisers are telling you that these deficits can be defeated through further reductions in tax rates, then you need new advisers. More robust economic growth could certainly help, but nearly every one of your administration’s economic forecasts – both before and after 9-11 – has proved overly optimistic. Expenditure cuts could be part of the answer, but your record so far has been one of increasing expenditures, not reducing them.

What is called for, we believe, is a dramatic reorientation of fiscal policy, including substantial reversals of your tax policy. Running a budget deficit in response to a short bout of recession is one thing. But running large structural deficits over a long period is something else entirely. We therefore urge you to consider the fiscal realities we now face and the substantial burden they are placing on our economy.

We also urge you to consider the distributional consequences of your policies. Under your administration, the income gap between the most affluent Americans and everyone else has widened. Although the latest data reveal that real household incomes have dropped across the board since you took office, low and middle income households have experienced steeper declines than upper income households. To be sure, the general phenomenon of mounting inequality preceded your administration, but it has continued (and, by some accounts, intensified) over the past three and a half years.

Some degree of inequality is inherent in any free market economy, creating positive incentives for economic and technological advancement. But when inequality becomes extreme, it can be socially corrosive and economically dysfunctional. Problems of this sort are visible throughout much of the developing world. At the moment, the most commonly accepted measure of inequality – the so-called Gini coefficient – is far higher in the United States than in any other developed country and is continuing to move upward. We don’t know where the breakpoint is for the U.S., but we would rather not find out. With all due respect, we believe your tax policy has exacerbated the problem of inequality in the United States, which has worrisome implications for the economy as a whole. We very much hope you will take this threat to our nation into account as you consider new fiscal approaches to address the nation’s most pressing economic problems.

Sensible and farsighted economic management requires true discipline, compassion, and courage – not just slogans. Given the tenuous state of the American economy, we believe that the time for an honest assessment of the problem and for genuine corrective action is now. Ignoring the fiscal crisis that has taken hold during your presidency may seem politically appealing in the short run, but we fear it could ultimately prove disastrous. From a policy standpoint, the clear message is that more of the same won’t work. The warning signs are already visible, and it is incumbent upon all of us to pay attention.

Respectfully submitted,


Francis Aguilar
Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Ramon J. Aldag
Glen A. Skillrud Family Chair in Business
School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Teresa M. Amabile
Edsel Bryant Ford Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Kenneth R. Andrews
Ross Graham Walker Professor Management Controls, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

James E. Austin
Eliot I. Snider and Family Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Joseph L. Badaracco
John Shad Professor of Business Ethics
Harvard Business School

Lotte Bailyn
T Wilson (1953) Professor of Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

George P. Baker
Herman C. Krannert Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Louis B. Barnes
John D. Black Professor, Emeritus; Professor of Organizational Behavior, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

James N. Baron
Walter Kenneth Kilpatrick Professor of Organizational Behavior and Human Resources
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University


Jean M. Bartunek
Robert A. and Evelyn J. Ferris Chair, Professor of Organization Studies
Carroll School of Management, Boston College

Yehuda Bassock
Professor
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California

Thomas A. Bausch
Professor
College of Business Administration, Marquette University

Max H. Bazerman
Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Cynthia Beath
Professor Emeritus
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Michael Beer
Cahners-Rabb Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Jack N. Behrman
Luther Hodges Distinguished Professor Emeritus
Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina

Norman A. Berg
MBA Class of 1958 Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Barbara Bird
Associate Professor of Management
Kogod School of Business, American University

John E. Bishop
Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Robert B. Bostrom
L. Edmund Rast Professor of Business
Terry College of Business, University of Georgia

Joseph L. Bower
Donald K. David Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Stephen P. Bradley
William Ziegler Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Arthur P. Brief
Lawrence Martin Professor of Business
Freeman School of Business, Tulane University

Phillip Bromiley
Curtis L. Carlson Chair in Strategic Management
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota

Alfred D. Chandler
Isidor Straus Professor Business History, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Chao C. Chen
Professor
Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University

Charles J. Corbett
Associate Professor of Operations Management and Environmental Management
UCLA Anderson School of Management

Thomas G. Cummings
Professor
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California

Michael Cusumano
Sloan Management Review Distinguished Professor
MIT Sloan School of Management

Fariborz Damanpour
Professor
Rutgers Business School


Jose de la Torre
Dean, Chapman Graduate School of Business
Florida International University

John A. Deighton
Harold M. Brierley Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Rohit Deshpande
Sebastian S. Kresge Professor of Marketing
Harvard Business School

Nancy DiTomaso
Professor
Rutgers Business School--Newark and New Brunswick

Jane E. Dutton
Professor
University of Michigan Business School

Amy Edmondson
Professor
Harvard Business School

Benjamin C. Esty
Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Ronald F. Fariña
Associate Professor
Daniels College of Business, University of Denver

James A. Fitzsimmons
William H. Seay Centennial Professor of Business
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

James W. Fredrickson
Tom E. Nelson, Jr. Regents Professor of Business
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Sherwood C. Frey, Jr.
Ethyl Corporation Professor of Business Administration
Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia

Cynthia V. Fukami
Professor
Daniels College of Business, University of Denver

Pankaj Ghemawat
Jaime and Josefina Chua Tiampo Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Stephen M. Gilbert
Associate Professor
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

James R. Glenn, Jr.
Professor of Management
College of Business, San Francisco State University

Leslie E. Grayson
Isidore Horween Research Professor, Emeritus
Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia

Jerry R. Green
Daniel A. Wells Professor of Political Economy,
John Leverett Professor in the University
Harvard Business School

Leonard Greenhalgh
Professor of Management
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth

Douglas T. Hall
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Boston University School of Management

Rebecca M. Henderson
Eastman Kodak LFM Professor
MIT Sloan School of Management

Linda A. Hill
Wallace Brett Donham Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School


Raymond Hogler
Professor of Management
College of Business, Colorado State University

Yasheng Huang
Associate Professor of International Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

Mariann Jelinek
The Richard C. Kraemer Professor of Business Strategy
School of Business, College of William & Mary

David B. Jemison
Foster Parker Centennial Professor of Management and Finance
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

John M. Jermier
Exide Professor of Sustainable Enterprise Research
College of Business, University of South Florida

Shulamit Kahn
Associate Professor
Boston University School of Management

Kate M. Kaiser
Associate Professor
College of Business, Marquette University

Rosabeth M. Kanter
Ernest L. Arbuckle Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Steven O. Kimbrough
Professor
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Stephen J. Kobrin
Wurster Professor of Multinational Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Thomas A. Kochan
George Maverick Bunker Professor of Work and Employment Relations
MIT Sloan School of Management

Nancy F. Koehn
James E. Robison Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Howard Kunreuther
Cecilia Yen Koo Professor of Decision Sciences and Public Policy
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Rajiv Lal
Stanley Roth, Sr. Professor of Retailing
Harvard Business School

Theresa Lant
Associate Professor of Management
Stern School of Business, New York University

Paul R. Lawrence
Wallace Brett Donham Professor of Organizational Behavior, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Carrie R. Leana
Professor of Business Administration and of Public and International Affairs
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh

Dorothy A. Leonard
William J. Abernathy Professor of Business Administration, Emerita
Harvard Business School

Herman B. Leonard
Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Donald R. Lessard
Epoch Foundation Professor of International Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

Daniel A. Levinthal
Julian Aresty Professor of Management and Economics
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania


E. Allan Lind
Thomas A. Finch Professor of Business Administration
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

Richard M. Locke
Alvin J. Siteman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Political Science
MIT Sloan School of Management

George C. Lodge
Jaime and Josefina Chua Tiampo Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Jay W. Lorsch
Louis E. Kirstein Professor of Human Relations
Harvard Business School

Michael Magazine
Professor
College of Business, University of Cincinnati

Michael R. Manning
Professor of Management
College of Business Administration & Economics, New Mexico State University

Theodore R. Marmor
Professor of Public Policy and Management
Yale School of Management and Political Science Department

Joanne Martin
Merrill Professor of Organizational Behavior
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University

Thomas K. McCraw
Isidor Straus Professor of Business History
Harvard Business School

Anita M. McGahan
Professor and Everett W. Lord Distinguished Faculty Scholar
Boston University School of Management

Kathleen L. McGinn
Cahners-Rabb Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Robert P. McGowan
Professor
Daniels College of Business, University of Denver

Robert C. Merton
John and Natty McArthur University Professor
Harvard Business School

David M. Messick
Kaplan Professor of Ethics and Decision in Management
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

Alan D. Meyer
Charles H. Lundquist Professor of Entrepreneurial Management
Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon

Marshall W. Meyer
Richard A. Sapp Professor, Professor of Management and Sociology
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Richard F. Meyer
Thomas D. Casserly, Jr. Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Ian Mitroff
Harold Quinton Distinguished Professor of Business Policy
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California

Cynthia A. Montgomery
Timken Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

David A. Moss
John G. McLean Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

J. Keith Murnighan
Harold H. Hines Jr. Distinguished Professor of Risk Management
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University


Steven Nahmias
Professor
Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University

Barry Nalebuff
Milton Steinbach Professor of Management
Yale School of Management

Das Narayandas
Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Paul Newman
Clark W. Thompson, Jr. Chair in Accounting
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

William Ocasio
John L. and Helen Kellogg Distinguished Professor of Management and Organizations
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

Paul Osterman
NTU Professor of Human Resources and Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

Lynn S. Paine
John G. McLean Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Johannes M. Pennings
Marie and Joseph Melone Professor
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Margaret Peteraf
Associate Professor of Business Administration
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth

Joel Podolny
Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management
Harvard Business School

John W. Pratt
William Ziegler Professor Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Drazen Prelec
Professor of Management Science
MIT Sloan School of Management

Keith G. Provan
Eller Professor of Public Administration & Policy
Eller College of Management, University of Arizona

Ronald E. Purser
Professor of Management
College of Business, San Francisco State University

Roy Radner
L. N. Stern School Professor of Business
Stern School of Business, New York University

Daniel Raff
Associate Professor of Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Howard Raiffa
Frank Plumpton Ramsey Professor Managerial Economics, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

V. Kasturi Rangan
Malcolm P. McNair Professor of Marketing
Harvard Business School

Stefan H. Robock
R. D. Calkins Professor of International Business, Emeritus
Graduate School of Business, Columbia University

David Rogers
Professor Emeritus of Management and Sociology
Stern School of Business, New York University

John W. Rosenblum
Dean Emeritus
Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia


Lori Rosenkopf
Associate Professor of Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Walter J. Salmon
Stanley Roth, Sr. Professor of Retailing, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Carol Saunders
Professor of MIS
College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida

Melissa A. Schilling
Associate Professor
Stern School of Business, New York University

Arthur Schleifer, Jr.
James J. Hill Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Claudia B. Schoonhoven
Professor of Organization and Strategy
Graduate School of Management, University of California, Irvine

Bruce R. Scott
Paul Whiton Cherington Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Michael S. Scott-Morton
Jay W. Forester Professor of Management, Emeritus
MIT Sloan School of Management

James K. Sebenius
Gordon Donaldson Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Benson P. Shapiro
Malcolm P. McNair Professor of Marketing, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Roy D. Shapiro
Philip Caldwell Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

William F. Sharpe
STANCO 25 Professor of Finance, Emeritus
Stanford Business School

Alvin J. Silk
Lincoln Filene Professor of Business Administration, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Harbir Singh
Edward H. Bowman Professor of Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Jitendra V. Singh
Saul P. Steinberg Professor of Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Sim B. Sitkin
Associate Professor
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

William B. Snavely
Professor of Management
Richard T. Farmer School of Business, Miami University

Olav Sorenson
Associate Professor
UCLA Anderson School of Management

Debora L. Spar
Spangler Family Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Richard Staelin
Edward and Rose Donnell Professor of Business Administration
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

William H. Starbuck
ITT Professor of Creative Management
Stern School of Business, New York University


John Sterman
Jay W. Forester Professor of Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

Richard S. Tedlow
MBA class of 1949 Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi
Professor of Organization Change
College of Business and Technology, Benedictine University

David A. Thomas
Naylor Fitzhugh Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

William R. Torbert
Professor
Carroll School of Management, Boston College

Anne S. Tsui
Motorola Professor
W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University

Michael L. Tushman
Paul R. Lawrence MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Karl T. Ulrich
Professor of Operations and Information Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Garrett J. van Ryzin
Paul M. Montrone Professor of Private Enterprise
Graduate School of Business, Columbia University

N. Venkat Venkatraman
David J. McGrath Jr. Professor of Management
Boston University School of Management

Richard H. K. Vietor
Senator John Heinz Professor of Environmental Management
Harvard Business School

Sandra Waddock
Professor of Management
Carroll School of Management, Boston College

Melanie Wallendorf
Eller Professor of Marketing
Eller College of Management, University of Arizona

Richard T. Watson
J. Rex Fuqua Distinguished Chair for Internet Strategy
Terry College of Business, University of Georgia

David Weil
Associate Professor of Economics
Boston University School of Management

Louis T. Wells
Herbert F. Johnson Professor of International Management
Harvard Business School

Patricia H. Werhane
Ruffin Professor of Business Ethics
Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia

Birger Wernerfelt
J. C. Penney Professor of Management Science
MIT Sloan School of Management

D. Eleanor Westney
Society of Sloan Fellows Chair in Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

James D. Westphal
Ed and Molly Smith Chair in Business Administration
McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin

Robert B. Wilson
Adams Distinguished Professor of Management, Emeritus
Stanford Business School


Sid Winter
Deloitte and Touche Professor of Management
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

JoAnne Yates
Sloan Distinguished Professor of Management
MIT Sloan School of Management

David B. Yoffie
Max and Doris Starr Professor of International Business Administration
Harvard Business School

Abraham Zaleznik
Konosuke Matsushita Professor of Leadership, Emeritus
Harvard Business School

Ray Zammuto
Professor of Management
Business School, University of Colorado at Denver

Paul H. Zipkin
The T. Austin Finch, Sr. Professor of Business
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University

The above tenured or emeritus professors have signed in their individual capacities. The letter represents the signers’ own views, not those of the institutions with which they are affiliated.


Posted at 05:05 pm by blog swarm
 

Nov. 2 - Schedule Today

 

ACT has spent all year laying the groundwork for Democratic victories in federal, state and local elections.  But now, success lies in your hands.

Thousands of paid canvassers have prepared for the largest get-out-the-vote effort in history.  With your help, we've registered record numbers of new voters and met with millions of targeted voters at their doorsteps.  Now we need your help getting these voters to the polls. 

ACT needs over 25,000 volunteers on Election Day. Sign up today.

October is the month ACT was built for.  Here are just a few highlights from the month so far:

The Vote for Change Tour is underway.  The 37 show tour (presented by MoveOn PAC to benefit ACT) is introducing hundreds of thousands of music fans to ACT.  Monday's finale in Washington DC will be televised on Sundance Channel and webcast by Real Networks.  More info here.

Fighting back in Ohio!   Over 125,000 of you have signed our petition to Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell demanding that he accepts all voter registration forms.  Your outrage -- and the media attention it has fueled --forced him to back down.  Read the petition here.

Rental Vans.  We asked for your help funding the vans needed to transport volunteers and voters on Election Day.  Thousands of you responded contributing over $225,000.  $136.68 is the average daily cost of a rental van.  Donate today. 

Along with you there are over 225,000 ACTivists receiving this message today.  Each one of us has an important role to play in the weeks ahead.  Please make your Election Day plans today, recruit your friends, make contact with an ACT office and be prepared for the challenge of a lifetime. 

Together, we can do this... and we will win.

Sign up now to volunteer on Election Day.

With great appreciation,

Ellen Malcolm
President
America Coming Together

PS.  For over a year, ACT canvassers have been spreading the truth, door-to-door and face-to-face.  A new film, Going Upriver: The Long War of John Kerry is revealing the truth about John Kerry's heroic service in Vietnam.   Help support the truth.  Find a theater in your area now.


Posted at 03:21 pm by blog swarm
 

Time is short

Whether John Kerry or George Bush sits in the White House for the next four years is up to us. The commitment you make throughout the final month of this campaign will decide this election.

You've helped get us to this point. You helped raise more than $16 million online for the Democratic Party in September -- an incredible new record. Now, we've got to raise $20 million during the final month of this campaign.

https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html

For one last time, we need your help to meet three October deadlines. Your actions during the next four weeks will mean the difference between victory or defeat for John Kerry, John Edwards, and Democrats down the ticket.

Our first critical deadline is just two days away at midnight on Friday, October 8 -- just hours after John Kerry and George Bush meet in their next debate. The money raised this week will guide critical decisions about the advertising aired in the crucial swing states.

Our goal this week is to raise an extra $5 million for vitally important ads. With that kind of support, the Democratic Party will use an aggressive ad campaign to build on the momentum stemming from the strong debate performances of John Kerry and John Edwards to help the entire ticket win this Novemeber 2.

Help us meet our goal:

https://www.democrats.org/support/kerry.html

Two other deadlines loom right around the corner. By midnight on October 15, the final decisions about priorities in swing states must be made, and on October 27, the online fundraising drive must be finished if the money we raise is going to do us any good. By that point, the Democratic Party must have all its money in hand as you and other loyal supporters help pour resources into the most extensive get-out-the-vote effort in our nation's history.

Time is short. The stakes are high. And your determination to help our candidates pull through to victory counts for everything. To win this election, the Democratic Party must make every decision based on strategy, not finances. It's four weeks of hard work or four more years of Bush and Cheney. It is that simple.

I want to end this message with the same words that we use to end our staff meetings here at headquarters.

Let's go win another day,

Mary Beth Cahill
Campaign Manager


Posted at 11:16 am by blog swarm
 

Cheney full of shit

We're on a roll. In last night's vice presidential debate, Dick Cheney was angry, misleading and petulant; Edwards took him on with warmth, clarity and the facts. CBS News reported this morning that Edwards "continued the Democratic ticket's winning streak," beating Cheney by 13 percentage points in a post-debate poll of uncommitted voters.[1]

Again and again, Cheney tried to mislead the public about the war in Iraq and our economic problems here at home. He even claimed that he’d never met Edwards before when he had, in public, twice. But John Edwards wouldn't let him get away with it: when Cheney tried once again to link al Qaeda and 9/11, Edwards said, "Mr. Vice President, you are still not being straight with the American people," and explained that there was absolutely no connection. We've compiled a bunch more of these misleads -- and the facts -- below. And we captured that strong rebuttal on tape: you can check it out at www.moveonpac.org.

The problem is that Cheney lies with utter conviction, so for some of the folks who are just tuning in to the presidential contest, it's difficult to tell who was fabricating and who was telling the truth. But if we all just take one of Cheney's false statements listed below and write to our local paper about it, we can debunk Cheney's distortions and demonstrate Edwards' commitment to the truth.

It's important work: the tens of thousands of letters MoveOn members wrote after the first presidential debate made a real impact on the post-debate environment. Our letter-to-the-editor tool makes it easy to find your local newspaper and submit a letter online -- it just takes a couple of minutes. Write a letter now at:

http://www.moveonpac.org/lte/lte.html?zip=94108&lte_campaign_id=14

Vice President Cheney's remarks last night were riddled with inaccuracies -- more than we can describe here. But we've listed a few of the biggest whoppers below.

CHENEY'S MISLEAD: "I have not suggested there's a connection between Iraq and 9/11"

THE TRUTH: As the Washington Post reports today, Cheney has repeatedly insinuated and "strongly suggested" that Saddam Hussein was behind the attacks on September 11th.[2] And in its fact check column today, the Boston Globe says "Cheney has consistently asserted strong prewar links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, even after the 9/11 Commission definitively concluded that there had not been a collaborative relationship between the two. In a radio interview in January 2004, Cheney said: 'I think there's overwhelming evidence that there was a connection between Al Qaeda and the Iraqi government.'"[3]

On December 9, 2001, Cheney went on "Meet the Press" to perpetuate the now entirely debunked theory that one of the 9/11 hijackers met with an Iraqi official.[4] He went back on a year ago to describe Iraq as part of ""the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault for many years, but most especially on 9/11."[5]

Most recently, Cheney has claimed that Iraq harbored the terrorist Abu Musab al Zarqawi, and said Zarqawi "is an al Qaeda associate who took refuge in Baghdad, found sanctuary and safe harbor there before we ever launched into Iraq."[6] But yesterday, a report Cheney himself requested found that there is no conclusive evidence to support that claim. An administration official said, "The evidence is that Saddam never gave Zarqawi anything."[7]

CHENEY'S MISLEAD: "900,000 small businesses will be hit" by the Kerry-Edwards plan to roll back tax cuts for people in the top income bracket.

THE TRUTH: As the Washington Post writes this morning: "This is misleading. Under Cheney's definition, a small business is any taxpayer who includes some income from a small business investment, partnership, limited liability corporation or trust. By that definition, every partner at a huge accounting firm or at the largest law firm would represent small businesses. According to IRS data, a tiny fraction of small business "S-corporations" earn enough profits to be in the top two tax brackets. Most are in the bottom two brackets."[8]

CHENEY'S MISLEAD: "We have added 1.7 million jobs to the economy."

THE TRUTH: On November 2nd, George Bush will be the first president in 70 years to lose jobs. There will be about a million fewer jobs than there were when Bush took office -- and about 7 million fewer than Bush's own post-9/11 estimate. Cheney's using fuzzy math: 1.7 million jobs have been added, but millions more have been lost.[9]

CHENEY'S MISLEAD: "The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight."

THE TRUTH: This one-liner was one of Cheney's best zingers of the night, but even it isn't true: Cheney and Edwards have met in public at least twice. They met when Edwards escorted Elizabeth Dole to be sworn in by Cheney as Senator and at the National Prayer Breakfast. At the Breakfast, he even called Edwards out by name, starting his remarks with the words, "Thank you very much. Congressman Watts, Senator Edwards, friends from across America and distinguished visitors to our country from all over the world, Lynne and I are honored to be with you all this morning."[10] You can actually watch video of the two of them shaking hands at www.democrats.org.

If Cheney's willing to flat-out lie about whether or not he's met John Edwards -- a rather objective question -- it's clear he won't be straight with the American people on more important issues.

When John Kerry won the first presidential debate, MoveOn members wrote tens of thousands of letters to the editors of the nation's newspapers. The letters served a critical role, solidifying the perception that Kerry was the clear winner and Bush was on defense. The post-debate conversation is just as important today, when it will shape the media's run up to the second Presidential debate Friday.

Can you take a few minutes to debunk one of the misleads above in a letter to the editor? Our tool makes it really easy to find a newspaper in your area and send in your thoughts.

Just go to:

http://www.moveonpac.org/lte/lte.html?zip=94108&lte_campaign_id=14

As Edwards mentioned last night, Cheney's record is pretty scary: "When he was one of 435 members of the United States House, he was one of 10 to vote against Head Start, one of four to vote against banning plastic weapons that can pass through metal detectors. He voted against the Department of Education. He voted against funding for Meals on Wheels for seniors. He voted against a holiday for Martin Luther King. He voted against a resolution calling for the release of Nelson Mandela in South Africa." Let's make sure we vote him out on November 2nd.

Sincerely,

--Adam, Eli, Hannah, James, Laura, and the whole MoveOn PAC Team
  Wednesday, October 6th, 2004

P.S. Another great source for the real facts behind Cheney’s spin is the American Progress Action Fund’s Progress Report. Their report dissects the debates today at:

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/

Footnotes:

1. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/05/opinion/polls/main647648.shtml
2. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6188565/
3. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/debates/articles/2004/10/06/fact_checking_the_debate/
4. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6188565/
5. Same as 4, above.
6.
http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0406/21/asb.00.html
7. http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/9836114.htm
8. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6188565/
9. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/debates/articles/2004/10/06/fact_checking_the_debate/
10. http://blog.johnkerry.com/rapidresponse/archives/003153.html#003153

PAID FOR BY MOVEON PAC www.moveonpac.org
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.


Posted at 11:15 am by blog swarm
 




Next Page

Blog Swarm

The online news magazine "Democrat Blog Swarm" is your insider's guide to political news
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:














Contact Me

<< November 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30




rss feed

Blogdrive