 |
|
Tuesday, November 09, 2004
by ProfessorX
Tue Nov 9th, 2004 at 10:42:44 PST
There have been lots of diaries and theories about how the Democrats lost the election. Personally, I think the recent statements from James Carville are dead-on accurate - you need a narrative to effectively communicate a message.
However, the visual communcation (graphic design) of that message is extremely important, and the DNC completely blew it in 2004.
That's right. The visuals that accompanied the Kerry campaign actually reflected the Bush criticisms about Kerry, effectively reinforcing the Republican narrative.
As we learned in 2000 with flawed ballot designs - design matters. Read on in the extended entry to see some examples of what I'm talking about.
Let's start by looking at the Kerry/Edwards basic graphic identity, as seen here, and comparing it to the basic John Kerry & Democratic messages.
The basic Kerry messages talked about supporting the working class by opposing outsourcing and creating jobs. The campaign tried to identify with the low and middle economic classes by talking about tax relief for those groups, while raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans. Another basic message was that John Kerry was tough enough to take on America's enemies - evidenced by the Vietnam tie-ins in the convention and Kerry using extremely tough talk towards Al Qaeda and bin Laden.
Compare this with Bush's narrative about Kerry: he's weak on defense, he's weak on decision-making (the flip-flopper bit) and he's weak on tax-relief (the he voted to raise taxes 900 times bit). Bush also painting Kerry as the patrician, rich society guy from liberal Massachussetts.
Unfortunately, Kerry's campaign logo accurately reflected Bush's statements. The logo is rendered in Georgia, or a very similar serif font (serif fonts have adornments called serifs on the ends of letters and numbers). Serif fonts are far more elegant and, if you'll pardon the expression, patrician than sans-serif fonts. They generally lend an old-school, upper-crust feeling to text. Don't get me wrong, I love a good serif font, but it might have backfired in this case.
Also, look how beautifully rendered the flag is in the logo. It looks soft - like a real flag - but in this case, that realism might also have been a liability.
Kerry's text and graphics are good design: beautiful flag, elegant text. However, Beautiful and elegant don't reflect his campaign messages of strength and middle class values. It does reinforce the narrative that he's a rich, weak flip-flopper.
Bush however, had a fairly simple message: "Stick with me for strong, consistent leadership. I'm a regular guy." In general, Bush pushed the basic message: I'm strong, and he's weak.
And when you examine his graphic identity you can see how Bush's campaign logo reflects his narrative. It's a big, bold Helvetica Neue that is extended out to give it more weight. It even leans to the right. The flag is a simple, rugged looking graphic. Where else can you find simple, bold, left leaning graphics and text? Seriously, all the Bush logo is missing is Calvin peeing on a donkey.
So Bush's graphic identity looks tough. It looks like it could kick Kerry's identity's ass. And most importantly, it absolutely reflects his campaign message. It was pretty damn effective, it looked good, and Republicans stuck it everywhere.
As a Democrat, I always felt uninspired by seeing Kerry signs around the neighborhood. Now that I've really thought about it, I think it was the total lack of visual reinforcement of the campaign. However, "The Real Deal" gear looked tough, working class and reflected strong leadership. It looked like this giant stamp had laid the smackdown on a shirt.
Would the results have been different had the campaign used the stronger logo? Maybe - who can really say? I do believe it might have moved some swing voters, and energized more of the base.
Since Carville is calling for the development of a cohesive narrative, I submit that we better get a visual narrative that serves as a strong reinforcement, rather than a liability.
disclaimer: ProfessorX is a pre-tenure college professor deep in a red state. He is director of the University graphic design program, and tends to get preachy about this kind of thing.
Posted at 02:15 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
drawing a new Map: defining a new DNC
by kid oakland
Tue Nov 9th, 2004 at 09:17:13 PST
There's been alot of discussion of who should run the DNC here.....including a solid pitch for Howard Dean.
I like that idea, with reservations. Dean is the kind of fresh voiced messenger we need to send....and his hunger for reform coincides with my own views.
However, his personality and managerial skills are more visionary CEO than company President with an eye on the bottom line and battleground encroachments from the competition....so...here's my two main arguments for where the DNC should go next...defining the job and, more importantly the task at hand....
Number one: the Job
The DNC should consider having co-chairs for this term, with a strong executive board behind them.
Since we're fighting a dual war that we can't afford to lose...we need to give everyone a stake in the battle, and draw on every talent available to us. I would say that Howard Dean as the front man...the CEO...the brand maker in collaboration with a nuts and bolts President (Donna Brazile?) would make for a powerful one-two punch.
Put a board behind them that draws on the deep pool of talent that we have that is out of office....too many names ot count, really....and you've got a team that is up to the job of...
- staking out our new message
- fighting the trench warfare battles of an opposition party
- building the framework for winning back legislative majorities
Co-chairs, one visionary, one nuts and bolts, with a new board committed to raising money and reinventing the Party, in my view, is our best bet. What we've got right now hasn't worked...and we need to send a powerful new message and a signal that it is not business as usual for the Democrats, not this time.
Number two: Drawing a new Map
This is our number one task. This is how we reform and reinvent our Party and win back legislative majorities in the States and in Washington.
What the DNC needs to do, right now...is get out in the field...in particular to the more populated red zones of this country, and ask two questions with an open mind:
- what are folks issues
- who do they respect as leaders in their communities and why
These are the two questions that will lay the groundwork of us taking back legislative power in this country. We need to know the issues turf better than our opponents...and we need to know who folks like and why they like 'em. It's that simple. Local issues, local faces....boots on the ground attention to what folks are talking about...be they local newspaper editors, business leaders, union reps, or the person working the register at Wal-Mart...or a nurse working the late shift.
We need to have a NEW national map... a national database with the results of this research. We need to have it broken down...and focus grouped and polled...so that we KNOW what's on people's minds and who they might like to vote into office.
One of my problems with just letting Howard run with this alone....is that I don't think he did a good job of either of these two things in picking his candidates. We did the same thing with our contributions. We tried to put OUR values out there, to impose them, rather than working from where people are at and building up.
In many ways, we need to face it that we didn't listen enough....and if we had listened, yes, we would have learned that the country was running way more culturally red than any of us would have liked. But we also might have learned the local issues, the other concerns that might give us an way back to the kitchen table with these folks.
And I am talking, literally about sitting down at the kitchen table with America and talking turkey. I am talking about a field team of seasoned, mature Democratic organizers going out and talking to folks...saying..."Hi, I'm from the Democratic Party....have you got a sec....??" And then listening, noting and following that information up with research and surveys and more ground operations.
And I'm not talking about sticking to our home turf. I'm talking about going directly into heavily populated "red zones" that we have a chance to win some support in....zones we have to win support in if we are going to start to win back legislative majorities in this coutnry:
- the zone from Lexington, KY up through Cincinnati, Dayton OH and South Bend, IN
- the I-4 corridor in Florida and stetching down to Ft. Meyers
- the Central Valley of California from Bakersfield to Stockon
- Eastern Tennessee down into the suburbs of Atlanta
- that wide swath of red from Dallas through Tulsa and into Springfield, MO
- the Western suburbs of Philadelphia
- Winston Salem and Raleigh NC..and up to Richmond and Lexington VA
- Phoenix
- Central Colorado
- Green Bay south and west
- the northern suburbs of the Twin Cities and St. Cloud
- Omaha and Lincoln NE and western Iowa
I think you get the point. We need to know what folks are thinking everywhere...but especially in zones that we seem to have just conceded the whole ball game in the past. We just can' t do that anymore.....and we need to be ready to field candidates who:
- talk about the issues that are important to folks
- have the respect of their community and we know it.
I personally find the soul searching going on to be wonderful...but am quite dubious of it if all that means is that folks sit on their ass doing the same old, same old and impose their new theory on folks from inside the beltway. That just won't work anymore.
We need to know what folks are thinking....not simply because what they think is important...but because...gulp...they were sending us a message with this last election. The best way to defend our core values and issues is to actually understand the terrain of battle.
This was Howard's dream....and perhaps he should head that fight. But only if he is willing to listen. To be honest, he has yet to prove that to me. But, from this kid's point of view...I'd just like to say:
Howard and the DNC, if you can hear this....
I am all ears.
Posted at 01:23 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Democratic Party must be 'born again,' Carville says
Democratic Party must be 'born again,' Carville says
Democratic strategist James Carville said yesterday that the Democratic Party's losses last Tuesday were no fluke, and that they need to rethink exactly who they are and provide something more than a litany of policy proposals.
"The underlying problem here is, there is no call to arms that the Democratic Party is making to the country," said Mr. Carville, the architect of Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign win. "We've got to reassess ourselves. We've got to be born again."
Time for a Narrative:
But yesterday, Mr. Carville said not only was it a great comeback, but coupled with the 2002 congressional-election losses, it shows it's time for Democrats to engage in a major re-examination.
"We can deny this crap, but I'm out of the denial. I'm about reality here," Mr. Carville told reporters at a breakfast hosted by the Christian Science Monitor. "We are an opposition party, and as of right now, not a particularly effective one. You can't deny reality here."
He said the party is desperately in need of a compelling narrative to tell voters, rather than the "litany of issues" the party stands for now.
He said Mr. Bush and Republicans presented just such a story: "These guys had a narrative — we're going to protect you from the terrorists in Tikrit and from the homos in Hollywood. That's it," he said. "I think we could elect somebody from Beverly Hills if they had some compelling narrative to tell people about what the country is."
CYA:
The other guests at yesterday's breakfast, both of whom worked directly for Mr. Kerry, said things weren't that grim.
"The Kerry campaign was in a position to win," said pollster Stanley Greenberg, and chief consultant Bob Shrum said Mr. Kerry came within "60,000 votes in Ohio" of winning the presidency.
Posted at 01:21 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a113625.htm
Topic: Drug War
Murder and Drug Running in Montana [Part II]
Washington Weekly
March 2, 1998 Wesley Phelan
Murder and Drug Running in Montana
Part Two
By WESLEY PHELAN
Last week I promised to bring readers up to date on recent developments in this story. Some of these developments have been quite unexpected. For example, I was contacted on February 23 by Ron Gold, ex-Special Agent for Army Counterintelligence. Mr. Gold did independent interviews with some of my sources to confirm the major thrust of my first article. Portions of his interviews, along with related documents, are now posted on the internet at Web Interview News [1]. Another unexpected development was my introduction to a former Coast Guard Intelligence Officer who has firsthand information about major drug-smuggling operations into the state of Montana. Portions of my taped interview with this person appear below. This week we begin with a follow-up interview with Melissa Buckles, Lay Legal Advocate for the Assiniboine-Sioux tribe on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation in Montana. The interview took place on February 27, 1998.
* * *
QUESTION: What are the recent developments regarding your attempts to halt the drug running at Fort Peck Reservation?
BUCKLES: The Tribal council had a meeting on Monday, February 23. They agreed they would investigate tribal officer Terry Boyd, whom we suspect of dealing drugs. I had provided them with a lot of documentation at their committee meeting on the previous Tuesday. They pushed that aside. They ordered the investigation on the basis of a complaint submitted by another tribal member, citing five years of harassment by Terry Boyd. One of the Council members recommended that they suspend him with pay pending an investigation, but that did not pass. We're afraid now, since he's not suspended, and he has full access to his investigative file, things might disappear out of those files.
QUESTION: And what do those files contain?
BUCKLES: They would have anything that had to do with the cases he's handled here on the reservation.
QUESTION: Did you think Boyd's activities were somehow connected to former FBI agents stationed in Glascow?
BUCKLES: Yes. In 1993 Raymond Dupree was a client of mine. He was arrested and convicted by a jury. He didn't understand his rights. Boyd was the criminal investigator in that case. Dupree, when he contacted me, was very angry. He said, "How can someone like Terry Boyd investigate me, when I have been framed on these charges? I'm sitting here in jail and he's walking around dealing drugs." I said, "Can we prove it?' He said, "I can. I know three other people right now who deal for him." I said, "Put it in writing." Before I could get back up there to him, he was released from jail. He had been sentenced to a year apiece on three different charges! I was told that the local prosecutor had come over to the jail with an order to release him, so he went free. He stayed clear of me. Last year he was arrested again for possessing eagle feathers for sale, and then released on bail. So I tried again to get an affidavit from him regarding Boyd. I started telling people I wanted to talk to him. Within a week, he was given a urine test, which he failed, and transported to federal holding in Billings.
QUESTION: Do you think they did that to keep you from getting to him?
BUCKLES: Oh yes. There was another man in the Roosevelt County jail. A local attorney and I talked to him on a Saturday by phone. He wanted to release documents to us. I typed up a release of information and ran down to the jail. The officer took it in to him and he signed it. By Monday- -and there was no indication of this before we talked to him- -he had been moved to federal holding in Billings. His family was shocked and angry.
QUESTION: What information could he have given you?
BUCKLES: I think information on Boyd and former FBI agent Jim Wixon out of Glascow, because those were the two who were involved in his case. They spirited this guy away within 48 hours of our talking to him.
QUESTION: So every time you locate someone who can produce information that tribal officers or FBI agents are involved with drugs, somehow they end up in federal custody?
BUCKLES: Yes. It's getting really frustrating. You get these people nailed down, and they know something, and they're willing to talk to you, and then they're gone.
QUESTION: What was his name?
BUCKLES: Vernon Chopper.
QUESTION: Has the tribal council considered getting the Bureau of Indian Affairs involved in this investigation of Boyd?
BUCKLES: The chairman of the Law and Order committee of the Council, Bob Welch, wanted the BIA Internal Affairs Division out of Albuquerque to do an investigation. A couple of the women on that committee fought vehemently against that. They didn't want the Internal Affairs Division out of Albuquerque involved, because they have covered up things in past investigations. The women did not want the Glascow FBI office involved for obvious reasons, and we don't want BIA out of Billings involved. We want the Eastern Office of the Interior Department, Bureau of Indian Affairs to conduct the investigation. We want it to come from Washington D.C. We have to make sure they don't pick agents that have any involvement out here. This is the first time the Tribal Council has voted for such an investigation. I'm hoping for the best.
QUESTION: Have other reservations in Montana experienced the same kind of problems with drug smuggling and murders that Fort Belknap and Fort Peck have?
BUCKLES: Northern Cheyenne has.
QUESTION: Where are they located?
BUCKLES: They are south of us down in Lame Deer, Montana.
QUESTION: What has happened there?
BUCKLES: On February 18, I did a phone-in interview with a program called "A Public Affair" on WORT radio in Madison, Wisconsin. They had a young lady from the University of Wisconsin on with me, Lauren McColley [2]. She is from the Northern Cheyenne reservation. She came into the studio that day and participated in the interview. She told of clandestine landings on her reservation. She said she lived in a very remote area of the reservation, and they would hear helicopters coming in late at night and landing. Then they would hear trucks coming down the dirt road. The helicopters would then take off, and the trucks would come out. They speculated that those were drug drops.
QUESTION: What else could it be?
BUCKLES: Nothing.
QUESTION: Have there been deaths on that reservation?
BUCKLES: Oh yes, a number of unsolved murders. She said there were about as many as here. She said that within the last week she got word from home that there had been a recent murder. A person who was known to be an FBI informant was found murdered along the highway. She said nothing was being done about that. Nobody knows how that person was killed, and there was no investigation.
QUESTION: Are you in touch with people on the other reservations in Montana?
BUCKLES: Willy Bradley has been in touch with people on the Rocky Boy Reservation, that's the Chippewa-Cree [3].
QUESTION: He mentioned that to me last week. He said they had had similar incidents.
BUCKLES: Yes. They have also had clandestine flights into their reservation and unsolved murders.
QUESTION: So this is rampant in reservations across the state?
BUCKLES: Yes. I'm sure that if we were completely networked with the other reservations we would find that the same thing is happening on all of them. Lauren McColley told the radio host, Esty Dinur, that the police were corrupt on her reservation, and the FBI doesn't do anything. They rubber-stamp whatever the tribal police or BIA police say.
QUESTION: Have you had any response to the open letter to Louis Freeh? [4]
BUCKLES: We have had no response.
QUESTION: Ron Gold has sent Janet Reno an email describing the situation. Have you heard anything back from that? [5]
BUCKLES: Nothing.
* * *
David Hume was an intelligence officer with the U.S. Coast Guard from 1978-1991. He was stationed at different times in Miami, Puerto Rico, Panama, Honduras, Costa Rica, Columbia, and Venezuela. Prior to serving in the Coast Guard he was a police officer and an assistant to the Attorney General in Delaware. The following is an excerpt from an interview conducted on February 27.
QUESTION: As you know, I am focusing on how drugs are getting to Canada from South and Central America. Can you help me out with that?
HUME: The narco-traffickers have an organization that is both vertical and horizontal in structure, and beats the hell out of most of our intelligence organizations.
QUESTION: Does it have ties to our people?
HUME: I think it has had ties to our people, and I'll say flatly that there have been people looking the other way. Let me describe how these things happen. Traffickers have known for years that most drug interdiction efforts focus on northbound traffic. If you have someone coming north through the Caribbean, you say this is someone coming to distribute drugs. Because of the limited enforcement capacity, people decided to not pay attention to southbound traffic. The drug runners are brilliant, and they decided to do an end-around and back-flush the drugs. That meant, for example, they would go out as far east as Bermuda sometimes and then go up to Nova Scotia, the maritime provinces--Prince Edward Island. Then they would come south and be able to off-load their drugs.
QUESTION: So they would fly out farther into the Atlantic, then go north.
HUME: Yes, using both air and maritime routes. But the maritime routes began to dwindle and the air routes went crazy.
QUESTION: So most drugs going into Canada are now taken by plane?
HUME: Yes, the majority, because there are so many dead areas for radar. That's one thing. The second thing is up in--for example, let's pick a state. Let's say Montana. Just as a hypothetical.
QUESTION: Good.
HUME: You have a hell of a lot of places where there are going to be tough reads on the radar. Many of the radar sets being used need to have an IFF tag.
QUESTION: What's that?
HUME: Identification friend or foe. It's called a squawk box. It's a radio transponder set on certain frequencies. On many of the law enforcement radar sets, unless you are squawking, you don't show up, especially if you're not painted well. The circle you see on air traffic control radar, that little circle, that's a squawk.
QUESTION: So law enforcement radars would not pick these planes up?
HUME: Hell no.
QUESTION: Do you know anything about an organization that is responsible for moving drugs into Montana from Weyburn, Saskatchewan?
HUME: There are a couple. One is run by a French-Canadian Mafioso. I can't remember his name. This is not public record, but it's known. He's on the maritime side of things.
QUESTION: That means shipping?
HUME: Yes. He got shut down pretty hard. He took some heavy losses.
QUESTION: What's the other organization?
HUME: There is another group that operates out of Montana.
QUESTION: Which city is it based in?
HUME: It varies.
QUESTION: Do you know the principals involved?
HUME: You need to speak with the newspaper people in Montana.
QUESTION: I have spoken to Mike Perry, who no longer lives there.
HUME: Mike Perry. There's a good man right there.
QUESTION: Well, he named some names, but I don't have any documents. I also spoke with Paul Richardson. He's supposed to run a series of articles, but they are tied up in the legal department.
HUME: This probably has something to do with people who are close to XXXXXXXX [Montana state official].
QUESTION: Yes, Perry tells me he is involved in it.
HUME: It's a tough one to call, you have to have documentation.
QUESTION: But you wouldn't contradict what he has told me?
HUME: No I would not.
QUESTION: And that's based on your past work in intelligence?
HUME: Yes.
QUESTION: Previously you shied away when I mentioned another name, XXXXXXX. Is that a dangerous name to say?
HUME: I sure as hell hope it isn't.
QUESTION: I want to know what you know about him.
HUME: OK. I only know what I have heard. You can't use the name for attribution, because I want him to stay out of my knickers. I'm told he has been involved in a number of transactions as a government agent. I'm told he has operations in the Caribbean and up north. Ask XXXXXXX about him and you'll see what this guy does, you'll see the bounds he does not have in his job, that he can do about anything he wants to do. You'll see that clearly.
QUESTION: So you've heard he is involved in these drugs going into Montana?
HUME: Yes.
QUESTION: Do you think it is true?
HUME: Oh yes.
QUESTION: What do you know about how the actual transport of the drugs took place?
HUME: I still have contact with some of my former intelligence mates. They say the maritime area has never completely gone away. The narco-traffickers have on more than one occasion filled a shipping container with products and mixed their drugs with that, or hidden drugs in the double walls of boxes. It gets shipped north and then they truck it south.
QUESTION: So they ship it to Canada and truck it across the Montana border?
HUME: Yes. Last time I checked that border I didn't see a fence one. Or, they will fly it down. As many ways as you can think of for air dropping, they'll do it.
QUESTION: Why would they want to use Indian reservations?
HUME: They are usually very isolated. Not a lot of people like to drive into Indian reservations or run through their woods. And the druggies are always looking for an open area, be it open from radar or human traffic.
It was standard knowledge in 1991, when I left the service, that the air routes were changing. XXXXXXX was a pilot working for XXXXXXX. He was also a radio expert. He perfected a device that--for want of a better term--is an airborne radar detector. It would tell you through the strength of the signal, run through some software, the approximate distance of the AWACs from you.
QUESTION: So they could then change routes to avoid the radar?
HUME: Yes. They found out they could use that to probe for an open area. Wouldn't you? They keep on pushing. They might find it one place today, another tomorrow.
QUESTION: So the routes constantly change, then?
HUME: Yes. But the Chinook (Montana) area is very warm.
QUESTION: That's where it is coming in?
HUME: Imagine how remote it is up there.
QUESTION: How do you know Chinook specifically is warm?
HUME: That was one of the places named as an ideal place because of the lack of a good radar picture.
QUESTION: Where was it named?
HUME: We had an informant who came forward and wanted to get out of a jam he was in, and I was at part of the briefing.
QUESTION: What year was this?
HUME: 1989.
QUESTION: He said Chinook was an ideal place?
HUME: Yes.
QUESTION: Did he say it was actually being used in that way?
HUME: Yes, and everyone laughed.
QUESTION: Did he name the people involved?
HUME: No, it didn't get that far. They all laughed and shut it down. They thought he was crazy, no one listened to him. I understood the reason they laughed. These were good federal employees. They do a good job every day. After 20 years they will retire and draw their pension, and the cause of death will be boredom.
QUESTION: I hope mine is, too.
HUME: They never work past five.
QUESTION: They need to be working in higher education, to see some 10-hour days. So, is that all you can give me to help in this story?
HUME: That's about it.
* * *
In the process of researching the current situation in Montana I have spoken to more than 20 people and taped approximately 10 hours of conversations. Obviously, the greatest part of my information has not been published. Nor will it be. My sources all agree that many state and local officials in Montana, and many agents of the federal government, are involved in one way or another with smuggling drugs into the state. These claims are not new, nor are my sources the only ones making them. Jack Wheeler wrote in the August, 1996 edition of Strategic Investment:
Mena in Montana? The Republicans may have their own drug smuggling scandal, similar to Bill Clinton's in Mena, Arkansas. Due to all the bad publicity, the drug cartels moving coke from Mexico through Mena may have relocated a substantial part of their operation to Montana, bringing the stuff in from Canada. There seems to have been a number of drug-related murders along the border, and corruption among state officials is reported to be widespread, perhaps reaching right into the governor's office. DEA sources have hinted that Governor Marc Racicot or some of his top aides might be indicted. Trouble for the Republicans is, Racicot is one of them [6].
Although it is one and a half years since Mr. Wheeler's words were printed, the FBI and the Justice Department seem no nearer to taking action than they were then. Meanwhile, innocent people are being murdered every month in Montana by narco-thugs; hundreds of others live in fear; and thousands of others are destroying their lives by consuming the illegal drugs. I am saddened by what I have learned through my research over the past two weeks. I fear that our system of government will never be purged of the many rogue agents and officials who take an oath to uphold the Constitution, but instead aid and abet--and profit from--the very activities they are hired to prevent.
Notes
[1] Mr. Gold's site is located at http://www.netinterview.com Mr. Gold's help is appreciated, because the more publicity given to events in Montana, the safer everyone fighting the corruption will be.
[2] I called the station and confirmed the interview took place. I was unable to locate Lauren McColley.
[3] The interview with Willy Bradley appeared in the February 23 edition of Washington Weekly.
[4] The Open Letter to Louis Freeh is now posted at Web Interview News.
[5] Ron Gold's email to Janet Reno follows:
Dear Attorney General Janet Reno,
Melissa Buckles, Lay Law Advocate, Fort Peck Indian Reservation, co-authored an "Open Letter" to FBI Director Louis Freeh on Dec 15, 1997, which alleges, in part, that evidence exists of a smuggling operation into Montana from Canada which involves and implicates agents of the FBI and that witnesses are available who can link FBI agents and other officials to drug related activities and violent civil rights abuses. Wesley Phelan wrote the story "Murder and Drug Running in Montana" which appeared in this week's online issue of "Washington Weekly" and I have posted additional material to my online news service www.webinterview.com.
Forty people have been murdered on one reservation alone, Melissa Buckles reports that witnesses have been attacked and threatened into silence. There are people in Montana who are clearly scared and are begging for help. Buckles reports that, since Dec 15, neither she nor any of the available witnesses have been contacted by the FBI, nor is there evidence of any investigative activity by the FBI. Why is the FBI silent and inactive in the face of these extremely serious allegations against their agents?
Posted at 01:41 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
By NEIL A. LEWIS
UANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba, Nov. 8 - A federal judge ruled Monday that President Bush had both overstepped his constitutional bounds and improperly brushed aside the Geneva Conventions in establishing military commissions to try detainees at the United States naval base here as war criminals.
The ruling by Judge James Robertson of United States District Court in Washington brought an abrupt halt to the trial here of one detainee, one of hundreds being held at Guantánamo as enemy combatants. It threw into doubt the future of the first set of United States military commission trials since the end of World War II as well as other legal proceedings devised by the administration to deal with suspected terrorists.
This shouldn't be in the US courts, it should be in the Hague. Bush should be impeached and then tried as a war criminal.
Posted at 12:09 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Monday, November 08, 2004
FUCK THE SOUTH
|
|
|
|
Fuck the South. Fuck 'em. We should have let them go when they wanted to leave. But no, we had to kill half a million people so they'd stay part of our special Union. Fighting for the right to keep slaves - yeah, those are states we want to keep.
And now what do we get? We're the fucking Arrogant Northeast Liberal Elite? How about this for arrogant: the South is the Real America? The Authentic America. Really?
Cause we fucking founded this country, assholes. Those Founding Fathers you keep going on and on about? All that bullshit about what you think they meant by the Second Amendment giving you the right to keep your assault weapons in the glove compartment because you didn't bother to read the first half of the fucking sentence? Who do you think those wig-wearing lacy-shirt sporting revolutionaries were? They were fucking blue-staters, dickhead. Boston? Philadelphia? New York? Hello? Think there might be a reason all the fucking monuments are up here in our backyard?
No, No. Get the fuck out. We're not letting you visit the Liberty Bell and fucking Plymouth Rock anymore until you get over your real American selves and start respecting those other nine amendments. Who do you think those fucking stripes on the flag are for? Nine are for fucking blue states. And it would be 10 if those Vermonters had gotten their fucking Subarus together and broken off from New York a little earlier. Get it? We started this shit, so don't get all uppity about how real you are you Johnny-come-lately "Oooooh I've been a state for almost a hundred years" dickheads. Fuck off.
Arrogant? You wanna talk about us Northeasterners being fucking arrogant? What's more American than arrogance? Hmmm? Maybe horsies? I don't think so. Arrogance is the fucking cornerstone of what it means to be American. And I wouldn't be so fucking arrogant if I wasn't paying for your fucking bridges, bitch.
All those Federal taxes you love to hate? It all comes from us and goes to you, so shut up and enjoy your fucking Tennessee Valley Authority electricity and your fancy highways that we paid for. And the next time Florida gets hit by a hurricane you can come crying to us if you want to, but you're the ones who built on a fucking swamp. "Let the Spanish keep it, it’s a shithole," we said, but you had to have your fucking orange juice.
The next dickwad who says, "It’s your money, not the government's money" is gonna get their ass kicked. Nine of the ten states that get the most federal fucking dollars and pay the least... can you guess? Go on, guess. That’s right, motherfucker, they're red states. And eight of the ten states that receive the least and pay the most? It’s too easy, asshole, they’re blue states. It’s not your money, assholes, it’s fucking our money. What was that Real American Value you were spouting a minute ago? Self reliance? Try this for self reliance: buy your own fucking stop signs, assholes.
Let’s talk about those values for a fucking minute. You and your Southern values can bite my ass because the blue states got the values over you fucking Real Americans every day of the goddamn week. Which state do you think has the lowest divorce rate you marriage-hyping dickwads? Well? Can you guess? It’s fucking Massachusetts, the fucking center of the gay marriage universe. Yes, that’s right, the state you love to tie around the neck of anyone to the left of Strom Thurmond has the lowest divorce rate in the fucking nation. Think that’s just some aberration? How about this: 9 of the 10 lowest divorce rates are fucking blue states, asshole, and most are in the Northeast, where our values suck so bad. And where are the highest divorce rates? Care to fucking guess? 10 of the top 10 are fucking red-ass we're-so-fucking-moral states. And while Nevada is the worst, the Bible Belt is doing its fucking part.
But two guys making out is going to fucking ruin marriage for you? Yeah? Seems like you're ruining it pretty well on your own, you little bastards. Oh, but that's ok because you go to church, right? I mean you do, right? Cause we fucking get to hear about it every goddamn year at election time. Yes, we're fascinated by how you get up every Sunday morning and sing, and then you're fucking towers of moral superiority. Yeah, that's a workable formula. Maybe us fucking Northerners don't talk about religion as much as you because we're not so busy sinning, hmmm? Ever think of that, you self-righteous assholes? No, you're too busy erecting giant stone tablets of the Ten Commandments in buildings paid for by the fucking Northeast Liberal Elite. And who has the highest murder rates in the nation? It ain't us up here in the North, assholes.
Well this gravy train is fucking over. Take your liberal-bashing, federal-tax-leaching, confederate-flag-waving, holier-than-thou, hypocritical bullshit and shove it up your ass.
And no, you can't have your fucking convention in New York next time. Fuck off. | http://www.fuckthesouth.com/
Posted at 09:15 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Wow, what can I say, in the first 24 hours over 540,000+ people viewed this page! I originally posted this to a few friends on a forum, using information from a list just like this created after the 2000 election. The list was carried by the St. Petersburg Times and the Economist, amongst others. The IQ data was originally attributed to the book "IQ and the Wealth of Nations", though I checked and couldn't find them in the current edition, I had posted saying such at the bottom of the table. The tests and data were said to have been administered via the Raven's APT, and The Test Agency, one of the UK's leading publishers and distributors of psychometric tests.
I have recently been emailed by someone claiming to have seen a retraction many issues later on the behalf of the Economist Magazine. The Economist could not independently verify the IQ data and the retraction can be found here. I have yet to find any retractions from the St. Petersburg Times or other publications. Here you can find a report correlating IQ and income, and their relation to how people voted in the 2004 election. This IQ data is based on SAT/ACT test scores. Here you can see the correlation between percentage of college graduates in a state and whom they voted for in the 2000 election.
I think matching census data to the results of the election reveals some very interesting things. For instance, there is a direct correlation that has been pointed out by the Boston Globe between the divorce rate per state, and who they voted for, as it turns out, the higher the percentage of people voting for Bush, the higher the divorce rate. That is very interesting considering many people voted based on 'values' and 'morality'. I am still scratching my head about that one, I was a 'values voter' as well, though I value honesty, compassion, and human life.
I am glad that so many people are so interested in IQ, statistical correlations, and their relation to politics. I believe such correlations are increasingly interesting as some candidates this year funneled more money into biased advertising and partisan propaganda than has ever been attempted in the history of the world.
| |
State |
Avg. IQ |
2004 |
| 1 |
Connecticut |
113 |
Kerry |
| 2 |
Massachusetts |
111 |
Kerry |
| 3 |
New Jersey |
111 |
Kerry |
| 4 |
New York |
109 |
Kerry |
| 5 |
Rhode Island |
107 |
Kerry |
| 6 |
Hawaii |
106 |
Kerry |
| 7 |
Maryland |
105 |
Kerry |
| 8 |
New Hampshire |
105 |
Kerry |
| 9 |
Illinois |
104 |
Kerry |
| 10 |
Delaware |
103 |
Kerry |
| 11 |
Minnesota |
102 |
Kerry |
| 12 |
Vermont |
102 |
Kerry |
| 13 |
Washington |
102 |
Kerry |
| 14 |
California |
101 |
Kerry |
| 15 |
Pennsylvania |
101 |
Kerry |
| 16 |
Maine |
100 |
Kerry |
| 17 |
Virginia |
100 |
Bush |
| 18 |
Wisconsin |
100 |
Kerry |
| 19 |
Colorado |
99 |
Bush |
| 20 |
Iowa |
99 |
Bush |
| 21 |
Michigan |
99 |
Kerry |
| 22 |
Nevada |
99 |
Bush |
| 23 |
Ohio |
99 |
Bush |
| 24 |
Oregon |
99 |
Kerry |
| 25 |
Alaska |
98 |
Bush |
| 26 |
Florida |
98 |
Bush |
| 27 |
Missouri |
98 |
Bush |
| 28 |
Kansas |
96 |
Bush |
| 29 |
Nebraska |
95 |
Bush |
| 30 |
Arizona |
94 |
Bush |
| 31 |
Indiana |
94 |
Bush |
| 32 |
Tennessee |
94 |
Bush |
| 33 |
North Carolina |
93 |
Bush |
| 34 |
West Virginia |
93 |
Bush |
| 35 |
Arkansas |
92 |
Bush |
| 36 |
Georgia |
92 |
Bush |
| 37 |
Kentucky |
92 |
Bush |
| 38 |
New Mexico |
92 |
Bush |
| 39 |
North Dakota |
92 |
Bush |
| 40 |
Texas |
92 |
Bush |
| 41 |
Alabama |
90 |
Bush |
| 42 |
Louisiana |
90 |
Bush |
| 43 |
Montana |
90 |
Bush |
| 44 |
Oklahoma |
90 |
Bush |
| 45 |
South Dakota |
90 |
Bush |
| 46 |
South Carolina |
89 |
Bush |
| 47 |
Wyoming |
89 |
Bush |
| 48 |
Idaho |
87 |
Bush |
| 49 |
Utah |
87 |
Bush |
| 50 |
Mississippi |
85 |
Bush |
Posted at 09:12 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Take Action:
Fund Black Box Voting and provide the resources for, "the most massive Freedom of Information action in history"
Sign Up, Blogpac is dedicated to turning our party into an institution that can return cannon fire, immediately and everywhere, using the internet, TV, online campaigns, and media pressure. We will fund not liberals or conservatives, but political street fighters. For starters, we ran online ads in 2004, and built EnjoyTheDraft.com, and IraqDraft.com. Now it's time to really get down to business. I hope you will join us. Please give us your email address so we can keep you informed of what we're doing specifically, and how you can help.
Use Democracy for America online tools to Organize.
Demand Ohio recount! by contacting Constitution Party candidate in Ohio
Help People for the American Way stand up for the courts
Posted at 05:48 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Lights, Cameras, ACTION
Online Political Warfare 101
We're worse off in congress, Bush was re-elected, and Ashcroft might be the next Chief Justice. But all is not lost, we still control the Fifth Branch of Government: The Internet.
The GOP gained ground on us this year in electronic politics, but our numbers still allow an advantage. To maximize our position, we need to refocus our efforts on Action.
The GOP is better at stage lighting. They learned the lesson of Nixon and spent the eighties bringing Hollywood tricks to political events. Clinton understood, but as recently as this year Howard Dean flopped after a snafu that would never had happened if the campaign had used a mixer and a mult-box for the press pool.
We also need better lighting when it comes to framing issues. While most of the attention has been focused on the words we use to frame the debate, what about the pictures? We need better pictures and the fact we have more cameras presents yet another potential. Link and echo good pictures and video.
But Action is where we win. Online, we need to focus on getting things done instead of just complaining.
We need links to action items blogged before the standard block-quote from the latest story. If Ashcroft were to be nominated, the best post would start out, "Help People for the American Way stop this madness" and then have the news quotes and the analysis on the updated situation. But start with the action, that must be the concern.
As more and more online quantification is based upon the number of links, a focus on compounding links is critical. Many of us have freeped Yahoo news, but posting links lets us freep www.blogsnow.com. If you see something smart, link and echo it. Especially calls to action, if you see an Action you agree with, link and echo it.
Also, we need to have kick-ass Rapid Response online ads. If you care about winning the online battle, check out BlogPAC:
Writing a blog post is not enough. Reading a blog post is not enough. Commenting on a blog is not enough.
Being educated is the first step toward political change. But the next step requires doing something.
BlogPac.org is that next step -- a group of bloggers not content to simply write words or read them, but eager to take action on the pressing issues of our day. We will not sit idly by and merely chatter as everything we care about burns. And you join us in our efforts.
Most of us understand the necessity of winning online. Who would we rather decide our ad strategy than the people behind BlogPAC?
Here's a partial list of the bloggers behind BlogPac, those serving on the advisory board. Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos, Jerome Armstrong of MyDD, Duncan Black of Atrios, Jeralyn Merritt of Talk Left, John Aravosis of AmericaBlog, Matt Stoller of BOP News, Anna of Annatopia, Jesse Taylor of Pandagon, & others that are aligned with the effort. We will have more info on the direction of BlogPac in the near future.
It is important for our third of the country to know how they are fucking up our Country. But it is imperative that our third also be versed in what Action we are taking to oppose the administration. It is time to fight back and online is the quickest method.
Posted at 04:46 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
by Shaula Evans
MSNBC's Hardblogger: Keith Olberman on George, John, and Ohio
The numbers don't add up
CIA-style hacking rigs election for Bush
Black Box Voting calls it Fraud
Surprising Pattern of Florida's Election Results
The Greg Palast classic: An Election Spoiled
Washington Dispatch: Vote Fraud in Ohio?
Presidential votes mis-cast on machines across the country
Reconciling voting machine and exit poll discrepancies
Ohio Whitewash
Institute for Public Accuracy on Ohio Elections
software flaw found in Florida vote machines
Florida numbers analysis (chart)
exit poll chart via BOP reader alyosha (thanks, man)
Stolen Election 2004
Open Voting Consortium
4000 votes missing in Pennsylvania County
Palm Beach county logs 88,000 more votes than voters
outrage in ohio
Broward County Florida voting machines count backwards
Diebold Pres Odell's 2003 promise to "deliver Ohio for Bush"
Greg Palast: Kerry Won
Diebold Machines yield fishy results
Machine Error Gives Bush Extra Votes in Ohio
More evidence of possible fraud in Darke County, Ohio
NC: 11,823 "extra" votes cast for Bush
chart: Florida voter reg vs performance
Something looks very wrong in Florida
Election Theft Bombshell: Major Security Breach
And finally, from the "We told you so" files: A technical look at how they can steal it (from October 9, 2004) Plus, from the BOP House Crew
Matt Stoller: another stolen election
oldman: speaks for itself
Barry Ritholtz: mapping out election results
Ian Welsh: Okay, it was stolen
Shaula Evans: fight fight fight Have more data? Add a link in the comments. New links and updates will be added at the bottom of the post.
Note, these are the kind of URLs that mysteriously wind up scrubbed Would some tech savvy person be kind enough to archive them, quickly?
Folks, this is THE news story right now: the numbers don't add up, the voting machines were rigged, and they're trying to steal the presidency again.
This story isn't in Big Media and word is, for whatever reason, the inside-the-beltway crowd won't touch it.
So push it hard in the blogs, talk to your neighbors, email it to your grandma, and send it to your local media.
Kerry's concession speech carries NO legal weight. Results aren't final until they are certified by the state election boards. Once Bush is coronated again, we're out of luck.
We have a VERY SMALL WINDOW to make sure the votes count. And, no one else is doing it: it is up to us.
Roll up your sleeves, and go forth to save American democracy.
Updates
International Election Monitors banned in Ohio
Group tallies more than 1,100 e-voting glitches
Slashdot: Avi Rubin & More on Electronic Voting
Slashdot: Evoting problems in Ohio
Permalink
Posted at 03:28 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
|
|
|
 |
|
 |