|
Friday, November 12, 2004
Real Provable Fraud HERE!!! by Guise
Fri Nov 12th, 2004 at 10:32:57 PST
Calling all Kossacks, check every state using this method that you can find votes registered for "none of these" or "none".
http://www.cnn.com/elections/2004
Under NV state they accidently published them. They show up in the total average of the presidential votes instead of being considered undervotes.
To learn about Benford's Law go Here: http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/may1999/nigrini.htm
Below is Benford's Law applied to every candidate's votes for every county in NV.
This is the state of Nevada without the "none of these" votes for No one. You can see how far off the percentages are. I'm not a professional analyst, but from what I understand of Benford's Law these discrepancies indicate fraud.
Actual % Predicted
In NV Benfords
Ones 33 33.333 30.103
Twos 12 12.121 17.6091
Threes 9 9.091 12.4939
Fours 8 8.081 9.691
Fives 12 12.121 7.91812
Sixes 3 3.030 6.69468
Sevens 5 5.051 5.79919
Eights 6 6.061 5.11525
Nines 5 5.051 4.57575
Now here are the percentages with the "none of these" votes per county. These votes are just placeholders with the magic number it seems. If you look at the percentages they level the bell curve out. This is only adding 17 total numbers. They tally to 3646 normally, but using the first number of these are what Benford's does to test probability, and the none votes disguise the fraud.
Actual % Predicted
In NV Benfords
Ones 37 28.696 30.103
Twos 16 10.435 17.6091
Threes 12 7.826 12.4939
Fours 8 6.957 9.691
Fives 12 10.435 7.91812
Sixes 5 2.609 6.69468
Sevens 7 4.348 5.79919
Eights 7 5.217 5.11525
Nines 5 4.348 4.57575
[Update]The numbers on CNN’s website, which is still up, (www.cnn.com/elections/2004 I have screen shots if it suddenly goes down) showed the fourth place finisher was “none of these”. The Phantom Candidate I call None tabulated 3646 phantom place holder votes, and represented a percentage in the final presidential tally. Normally these numbers would be shown as under votes from what I understand, but these weren’t. (undervotes are still seen in NV that aren’t calculated into “none of these”) They became None. None was represented in every county. In the smaller counties None would get numbers like 7, 6, and the like, but the larger the county the more votes None received. It took me along time to figure out because they represented a percentage value that was meaningless except to fill space in two ways I eventually found. How they hide them after being used I don’t know, but I’ve proven without a reasonable doubt that they cheated, and we don’t need to know until after the prosecutions start. So here’s what they did, and how they did it. The first numbers of the None votes is what they used to fill in statistical space to avoid detection by an algorithm called Benford’s Law. What this algorithm does is it takes the first number of any number to determine the probability of the series of numbers you’ve gathered. For example, if you take a sample of 50 numbers from a magazine, like “lose 50lbs.” on one page, and the next page you took 15 for how many ways there are to please your mate you, can roughly predict the percentages of these 50 numbers in a curve. . When you add in the first digits of None’s votes, and in some cases the only digit, then apply it to Benford’s Law, the anomalies simply disappear. Just like magic.
http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/jofa/may1999/nigrini.htm
Frank Benford made a simple observation while working as a physicist at the GE Research Laboratories in Schenectady, New York, in the 1920s. He noticed that the first few pages of his logarithm tables books were more worn than the last few and from this he surmised that he was consulting the first pages—which gave the logs of numbers with low digits—more often. The first digit of a number is leftmost—for example, the first digit of 45,002 is 4. (Zero cannot be a first digit.) Benford extrapolated that he was looking up the logs of numbers with low first digits more frequently because there were more numbers with low first digits in the world.
Exhibit1: Benford's Law—Expected Digital Frequencies
Benford then tested this idea by looking at the first digits of 20 lists of numbers with a total of 20,229 observations. His lists came from varied sources, such as geographic, scientific and demographic data. One list contained all the numbers in an issue of Reader's Digest. He found that about 31% of the numbers had 1 as the first digit, 19% had 2, and only 5% had 9 as a first digit. Benford then made some physics-related assumptions about the distribution of naturally occurring data and, using integral calculus, he computed the expected frequencies of the digits and digit combinations.
The expected frequencies of the digits in the first four positions can be seen in exhibit 1, which shows a large bias in favor of low digits in the first position. The probability that the first digit is either a 1, 2 or 3 is 60.2%.
Not all data sets follow Benford's law. Those data sets most likely to will have the following characteristics:
- The numbers describe the sizes of similar phenomena (for example, market values of corporations).
- The numbers do not contain a built-in maximum or minimum value (such as deductible IRA contributions or hourly wage rates).
Posted at 02:14 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
DNC Chair
I think Markos is right that the choice is roughly between the "status quo" and the "new." Someone like Vilsack will carry on things as they've been, while people like Dean or Rosenberg would signal a new direction (though Stirling spells out clearly all of the reasons Rosenberg would be a bad idea.) Full disclosure, I've met Simon a few times.
I've joked that I'll support (not that my support matters of course) the person who promises to fire the most people. That isn't because everyone who works there is necessarily individually incompetent, but it's obviously a place where institutional stasis has set in. I imagine phrases like "we do it that way because that's the way we've been doing it" are regularly spoken.
The Dean/Rosenberg tagteam is an intriguing possibility. But, it's important to understand that the job itself is largely undefined. The right question is not " who is the right person to do X?" The right question is, "who has the best ideas for determining what X actually is?"
Posted at 01:50 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Exit Poll Discrepancy Study
The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
BuzzFlash was forwarded a copy of a new research paper (271k PDF) on the exit polls from the 2004 election.
In "The Unexplained Exit Poll Discrepancy," Dr. Steven F. Freeman says:
"As much as we can say in social science that something is impossible, it is impossible that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote counts in the three critical battleground states [Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania] of the 2004 election could have been due to chance or random error."
The odds of those exit poll statistical anomalies occurring by chance are, according to Freeman, "250,000,000 to one." That's 250 MILLION to ONE.
He concludes the paper with this:
"Systematic fraud or mistabulation is a premature conclusion, but the election's unexplained exit poll discrepancies make it an unavoidable hypothesis, one that is the responsibility of the media, academia, polling agencies, and the public to investigate."
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
Posted at 01:47 pm by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
AARP Newspeak
First they support the disastrous Medicare drug bill and now they embrace whatever language Rove tells them to embrace. Cut your AARP card...
The White House dislikes the word "privatization,'' which it sees as a misleading and imprecise way to describe Mr. Bush's ideas for Social Security. Democrats insist that the term is accurate.
E-mail messages circulated within AARP in recent weeks indicated that the group would avoid the word whenever possible.
One message, by an editor of an AARP magazine, says, "There is a new forbidden word at AARP: Social Security privatization.''
Another e-mail message, by a manager of its Web site, says, "The term 'privatization' is stricken from our vocabulary forever.''
David M. Certner, the organization's director of federal affairs, said "privatization'' had no fixed meaning or definition. To some people, he said, it means "getting rid of the entire program'' - a goal not favored by the White House.
All this is just bullshit. While there is no plan on the table because there isn't actually any way to pay for it, Bush's not-plan would allow "volunteer" private accounts. You're free to not do it, but then you're just throwing tax money into a system which no longer has a guaranteed benefit payout. Some choice.
Posted at 09:32 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
by Ben P
This diary is the third part of my series (the first two parts posted at DKos only) demonstrating that Bush did not improve in urban areas, and if anything, went backwards from his 2000 totals. The idea that Kerry lost in America's cities and suburbs is foolish. He clearly lost the election in the exurbs and rural areas. The first two diaries I posted on this subject focused on blue states, for the most part: Washington (Seattle-Tacoma metro and Clark County (Portland suburbs)), Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh metro and Philadelphia metro), Michigan (Detroit metro), Ohio (Cleveland metro, Columbus metro, and Cincinatti metro), California (San Francisco, Los Angeles metro, San Diego metro, "Silicon Valley"/San Jose), Minnesota (Minneapolis/St.Paul metro).
|
Today, I focus on urban areas in red states. Initially, I thought that the urban areas in these locales would show Bush gains. But in fact, just the opposite. Kerry improved on Gore's totals in urban areas in states like NC, TX, CO, GA, MO and so on. This was particularly so in "new economy"/"knowledge economy" hotspots. Where Kerry did worse than Gore was in cities with large Latino populations. I think these findings are very significant for recognizing where are strengths and weaknesses lie going forward. So, on to the numbers:
Texas
Harris County (Houston and many of its suburbs): 2004: Kerry 44.64%, Bush 54.87%, 2000: Gore 42.9%, Bush 54.3%, Nader 2.4% (so, factoring in Nader, this county bascially stayed the same from 2000. If anything, Bush made a tiny gain here)
Dallas County (Dallas and many of its suburbs (? - Texas folks, correct me if I'm wrong): 2004: Kerry 49.03%, Bush 50.44%, 2000: Gore 44.9%, Bush 52.6%, Nader 1.9% (this represent a significant and (to me) surprising gain for Kerry on Gore's total)
Travis County (Austin and many of its suburbs (again, correct me if I'm wrong): 2004: Kerry 56.31%, Bush 42.24%, 2000: Gore 41.7%, Bush 46.90%, Nader 10.4% (now clearly, Kerry 15% gain from Gore's total came in large measure from Nader voters. But he also gained substantially from 2000 Bush voters as well. This county represents a fascinating and substantial swing, and mirrors the gains Kerry made in Ohio's Franklin County (home of Columbus))
Bexar County (San Antonio and some of its suburbs): 2004: Kerry 44.49%, Bush 54.49%, 2000: Gore 44.9%, Bush 52.2%, Nader 2.4% (now here, we see a small - 2 to 3% - Bush gain from 2000. The Latino factor at work? I would venture that this is the case)
Colorado
Denver County (the city of Denver and some suburbs (?)): 2004: Kerry 69.51%, Bush 29.41%, 2000: Gore 61.9%, Bush 30.9%, Nader 5.9% (now Nader voters were clearly a factor, but Kerry also made some decent gains on Gore's 2000 totals at Bush's expense - interesting)
Adams County (Denver suburbs and exurbs(?)): 2004: Kerry 48.39%, Bush 50.4%, 2000: Gore 44.1%, Bush 50.2%, Nader 3.9% (Basically the same results, factoring in Nader)
Arapahoe County (Denver suburbs and exurbs(?)): 2004: Kerry 47.29%, Bush 51.66%, 2000: Gore 43.5%, Bush 51.5%, Nader 3.9% (another unchanged county, factoring in Nader)
Jefferson County (Denver suburbs and exurbs(?) - contains Littleton, CO): 2004: Kerry 46.59%, Bush 51.9%, 2000: Gore 42.9%, Bush 51.0%, Nader 4.4% (at best, this represents a very slight gain for Bush - assuming everyone of Nader's 2000 voters voted Kerry in 2004. But basically unchanged)
El Paso County (Colorado Springs and environs - home of Focus on the Family (Dobson's outfit) and the US Air Force - known as a bastion of conservatism): 2004: Kerry 32.04%, Bush 66.82%, 2000: Gore 30.8%, Bush 63.9%, Nader 3.5%, Buchanan and the Constitution Party candidate 1.8% (so Bush made a small gain here - probably not surprising - but if Bush isn't making large gains in places like El Paso county, where in "urban" America would he be making such gains?)
Larimer County (Fort Collins and environs): 2004: Kerry 46.58%, Bush 51.87%, 2000: Gore 38.9%, Bush 52.7%, Nader 6.9% (Fort Collins is not exactly what one would think of when one pictures cosmopolitan blue state stereotypes. But even taking into account Nader, Kerry made a small, but not insignificant gain on Gore's 2000 performance here. Again, if Bush isn't making his "urban" gains in Fort Collins, where is he making them?)
North Carolina (note: Nader was not on the North Carolina ballot in 2000)
Mecklenburg County (Charlotte city and its exurban and suburban environs): 2004: Kerry 51.85%, Bush 47.85, 2000: Gore 48.2%, Bush 51.0% (again, this is a very solid gain for Kerry at Bush's expense. What went right for the Dems in Charlotte? They should find out. The "ideopolis" thesis at work? Perhaps.)
Wake County (Raleigh city and some suburbs, typically the most conservative part of the "research triangle area): 2004: Kerry 48.35%, Bush 51.26%, 2000: Gore 46.0%, Bush 53.1% (another decent gain for Kerry on Gore's 2000 total, if not as big as in Charlotte - but definitely worth noting nonetheless)
Durham County (Durham city and some suburbs (? - North Carolina folks help me out): 2004: Kerry 67.90%, Bush 31.75%, 2000: Gore 63.7%, Bush 35.6% (yet another substantial gain for Kerry on Gore's 2000 totals in a "red state" city)
Orange County (Chapel Hill - home of UNC's flag ship campus - and environs): 2004: Kerry 67.03%, Bush 32.46%, 2000: Gore 62.7%, Bush 36.3% (I'm starting to see a pattern in North Carolina . . . )
Georgia (now, here is a state where Bush made a significant overall improvement from his 2000 win - but he didn't do it in Atlanta)
DeKalb County (eastern Atlanta suburbs): 2004: Kerry 72.71%, Bush 26.65%, 2000: Gore 70.2%, Bush 26.7% (with Nader considered, this represents a very slight Kerry gain on Gore's total in 2000)
Fulton County (Atlanta city and some suburbs): 2004: Kerry 60.16%, Bush 39.18%, 2000: Gore 57.8%, Bush 39.8% (even with Nader considered, this represents a small Kerry improvement on 2000)
Cobb County (conservative western Atlanta suburbs and exurbs - Newt Gingrich's former district): 2004: Kerry 37.18%, Bush 62.09%, 2000: Gore 36.9%, Bush 59.8% (so a small - 2% or so - Bush gain on his 2000 total)
Gwinnett County (conservative northern Atlanta exurbs): Kerry 33.46%, Bush 65.82%, 2000: Gore 32.1%, Bush 63.7% (so another small Bush gain - 1 to 2%. Not surprising, but one would perhaps that Kerry would have done worse in a county like this. I'm somewhat surprised he didn't)
Missouri
St.Louis City (the city of St. Louis, surprisingly enough): 2004: Kerry 80.39%, Bush 19.3%, 2000: Gore 77.4%, Bush 19.9% (even factoring in Nader, this represents a small Kerry gain on Gore's 2000 totals)
St. Louis County (much of St. Louis suburbia): 2004: Kerry 54.38%, Bush 45.15%, 2000: Gore 51.5%, Bush 46.1% (this one is surprising to me. Kerry clearly made gains here at Bush's expense. At least 1% of his additional support came from Bush's 2000 totals. And this is a very suburban county)
Jackson County (the Missouri part of Kansas City and some suburbs): 2004: Kerry 62.48%, Bush 37.13%, 2000: Gore 59%, Bush 38.4% (again, this is another Kerry gain that came in part at Bush's expense. I would not have expected this before looking at the data)
SO: What can be concluded from my investigation so far?
1. That Bush's increased totals came from three sources: 9/11 "belt voters" in suburban New Jersey, Connecticut and New York, some gains amongst Latinos (but not everywhere - and not in Florida), but most importantly, amongst small town and rural folks
2. The most important divide in American politics today is between Democratic cities and "inner" suburbs and Republican exurbs and rural areas. It is not really the red state/blue state divide that is most important.
3. That Ruy Teixeiria's ideopolis thesis is real, but will not - in the short term at least - be enough for the Democrats to be a majority party.
I will present further analysis of metropolitan voting patterns in later diaries. To be continued. |
Posted at 09:31 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Ohio Irregulaties and Suppression
Dean Dozen's Mary Jo Kilroy wants you to be aware of the following public hearings in Franklin County, Ohio.
Anyone who experienced or observed election irregularities or voter suppression this election season is invited to come and give testimony at a public hearing before public officials, community representatives and the media. Your stories will be documented, recorded and put into a report and formal complaint to the Board of Elections. If you have any information about election irregularities please participate.
Citizens, voting experts, and investigative journalists will be invited to present testimony for the pubic record documenting instances of voting irregularities and systematic voter suppression.
Saturday, November 13, 2004, 1-4pm
New Faith Baptist Church
955 Oak St., Columbus, Ohio 43205
Call 253-2571 or email truth@freepress.org
Monday, November 15, 2004, 6-9 PM
Franklin County Court House A
373 S. High, Columbus, Ohio 43215
Auditorium, Meeting Room
Call 253-2571 or email truth@freepress.org
—Mary Jo Kilroy
Posted at 09:24 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
DailyKos has had THREE front page posts IN A ROW on Simon Rosenberg:
Posted at 12:39 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
by LooterScibby
The opening tone of this piece is harsh, but I think it gets the point across. Please, no scapegoats people.--Chris
This is for all of the folks who say, "Kerry abandoned us" when he conceded the election on Nov. 3. Let me screw your heads back on straight.
Edwards said every vote will be counted and when Kerry conceded hours later, also reiterated that promise. Why? That concession is legally irrelevant (he does not end the election) and the most important things are context, narrative and conventional wisdom.
Every political act is framed in a certian context, it develops a narrative which solidifies into conventional wisdom that may doom it or enhance it. Here is what Kerry did.
Kerry did not want the context to be "when will he concede? Will he concede? Concede. Concede," with the narrative "Kerry the sore loser, trying to grasp on in the face of 3 million plus popular votes," with an Ohio media circus, 10,000 Republican lawyers and a 1000 Republican CLEANERS (remember "the cleaner" from Pulp Fiction") to clean up murdered votes.
Instead, Kerry wanted the Republicans--to declare victory, get drunk, fucking party and focus on dividing up the spoils as each piggie tries to muscle up to the feeding bin. All the while, good folks like Black Box Voting and others are busy working to collect evidence and prepare challenges. The choice of battle and timing is ours.
The context needs to be "I am the voter. I voted. Now fucking count it. I paid for this system.
The narrative needs to be "If our bank can tell us how much money we have in our account to the penny, then when we bank our votes, we want them counted to the penny."
The conventional wisdom needs to solidify as "Even though the Republicans won, they cheated - even if the amount of cheating wasn't necessary to clinch the win - they did it the dirty way" AND "our voting system is broken, paper trails are necessary, computerized voting systems are all Republican connected and this wil change."
Can you imagine every media outlet camped out in Ohio running stories like "Election Fatigue! When will all of this be over? Is Kerry out of touch? Blah Blah Blah." Remember 2000 with Tom Delay's goons in Florida with the Brooks Brother Bum Rush (Let us in! Let us in!) That would really hurt us as well in the legislative battles we have to fight in Congress.
In the end, if it is about Kerry and not the voter, we will not be able to fix this system and every time in the future the issue is raised, Kerry's perceived sore loser effort will be invoked to quell the debate.
Do you really think Kerry was such a fucking wuss, a man of ZERO principle, ready to abandon everything? This is a smart thinking man who did the right thing in the right way. Watch it unfold. |
Posted at 12:32 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
Rosenberg Consensus Candidate
by kos
Thu Nov 11th, 2004 at 21:05:55 PST
This is the list of the 440 people that will make the choice of the new DNC chairman. The modern Democratic Party needs to reform this system -- make the choice of the Chair a democratic one, with input from all party members. But that's a battle for another year.
But this time, the decision will be made by those 440 individuals in a late January/early February vote.
Running for DNC chair is a tough task. There are no polls to gauge public sentiment. The candidates must personally call each and every one of those committee members and ask for their vote.
Here's the thing -- about 100 of them publicly supported Dean in the primaries as super delegates. That would be almost halfway to the magic number of 221. No other candidate has even remotely that level of initial baseline support.
Of course, some of those committeemembers might've abandoned Dean after the scream, or are looking for something else in a DNC chair. So no presumptions. But it would be nice if we could start seeing pro-Dean or pro-reform delegates start publicly voicing their support.
The only other person that has expressed a willingness to enter the race is Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack. There will be lots of names thrown out, but as of now, it's Vilsack and Dean.
If DNC delegates start announcing their support for a Dean candidacy, this early show of force would dissuade many Democrats mulling a bid from entering the sweepstakes. The anti-reform, status quo contingent would have to rally around a single candidate, and we'd have a nice, bloody fight on our hands. As there probably should be.
I understand not all out you who read this site savor a Dean chairmanship, and I respect that. But it is my opinion that we have two choices -- Howard Dean, or a peacemaking reform-minded consensus candidate (i.e. Simon Rosenberg).
The status quo is untenable.
Posted at 12:24 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
From dKosopedia, the free political encyclopedia.
Background from the DNC website:
Function of the Committee
The Democratic National Committee plans the Party's quadrennial presidential nominating convention; promotes the election of Party candidates with both technical and financial support; and works with national, state, and local party organizations, elected officials, candidates, and constituencies to respond to the needs and views of the Democratic electorate and the nation.
Members of the Committee
While anyone who is registered to vote as a Democrat is a member of the Party, there are 440 members of the Democratic National Committee.
The National Committee has 9 elected officers: The Chair, five Vice Chairs, Treasurer, Secretary, and National Finance Chair.
Membership on the National Committee is composed of individuals selected by the Democratic Party organizations in each state (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico), the U.S. Territories (American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands), and Democrats living outside the United States and those Territories listed above (Democrats Abroad).
Each jurisdiction is represented by its Chair and the next highest ranking officer of the opposite sex. An additional 200 votes are distributed to the states and territories based on population, with each receiving a minimum of two additional seats. Each delegation must be equally divided between men and women.
Also seated on the DNC are representatives of various Democratic constituencies and elected officials. These include two U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives, two members of the College Democrats, and three representatives each from the Democratic Governors, Mayors, State Legislators, County Officials. Municipal Officials, Young Democrats, and the National Federation of Democratic Women. Fifty members are appointed by the DNC Chairmen, and approved by the DNC, and are considered "Members-at-Large."
Democratic National Headquarters
Democratic Party Headquarters has been housed in a number of locations in Washington (and in New York) including the Mayflower Hotel and, of course, the Watergate.
Our current Headquarters building at 430 South Capitol Street, SE, in Washington, DC -- the first owned by the Party -- was built at a cost of approximately $6.5 million. The DNC moved into the facility in December of 1984.
The Democratic National Headquarters is shared by the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial and Congressional Campaign Committees, as well as the Harriman Communications Center, which provides state of the art media support to Democratic candidates, Party leaders, and elected officials.
Who votes for DNC chair? The 440 members of the DNC vote at the DNC Winter Meeting, usually sometime in early February. Via the public roster for the 2004 Democratic National Convention, here is the list of 440 DNC members:
Redding Pitt
Amy Burks
Hon. Alvin Holmes
Hon. Yvonne Kennedy
Joe Reed
Scott Sterling
Hon. John Davies
Claudia Douglas
Cindy Spanyers
Allimau Scanlan
Deanna Fuimaono
Fagafaga Langkilde
Clara Reid
Martin Bacal
Janice Brunson
James Pederson
Alexis Tameron
Sue Tucker
Ron Oliver
Don Beavers
Karla Bradley
Martha Dixon
Hon. Lottie Shackelford
Steven Alari
Jeremy Bernard
Rachel Binah
Hon. Willie Brown
Hon. Yvonne Burke
Michael Davis
Mary Ellen Early
Patricia Ford
Nely Galan
Alexandra Gallardo Rooker
Inola Henry
Hon. Mike Honda
Alice Huffman
Aleita Huguenin
Hon. Carole Migden
Hon. Gloria Molina
Bob Mulholland
Hon. Kevin Murray
Mona Pasquil
Christine Pelosi
Hon. Nancy Pelosi
Robert Rankin
Garry Shay
Christopher Stampolis
Hon. Art Torres
Norma Torres
Keith Umemoto
Hon. Antonio Villaraigosa
Hon. Maxine Waters
Vernon Watkins
Hon. Diane Watson
Hon. Rosalind Wyman
Steven Ybarra
Chris Gates
Andrew Boian
Julia Hicks
Mary Alice Mandarich
Hon. Ramona Martinez
Jonathan Postal
Hon. Wellington Webb
Hon. George Jepsen
Hon. Anthony Avallone
Bernice Bowman
Ellen Camhi
Martin Dunleavy
Mona Mohib
Dorothy Mrowka
Phil Wheeler
Richard Bayard
Leah Betts
Bert DiClemente
Karen Valentine
Morton Bahr
A. Scott Bolden
Donna Brazile
Mary Eva Candon
Yolanda Caraway
Arrington Dixon
Maria Echaveste
Patricia Elwood
Hartina Flournoy
Harold Ickes
Ben Johnson
Minyon Moore
Mirian Saez
Barbara Lett Simmons
Elizabeth Smith
Christine Warnke
James Zogby
Hon. Scott Maddox
Hon. Clarence Anthony
Jon Ausman
Cathy Bartolotti
Terrie Brady
Mitchell Ceasar
Hon. Joyce Cusack
Diane Glasser
Chuck Mohlke
Lula Rodriguez
Andrew Tobias
Hon. Diana Wasserman-Rubin
Ashley Bell
Carole Dabbs
Hattie Dorsey
Hon. Shirley Franklin
Robert Kahn
Herb Mabry
Richard Ray
Benjamin J. F. Cruz
Isabel S. A. (Becky) Lujan
Michael Phillips
Taling Taitano
Brickwood Galuteria
Stephanie Ohigashi
M.Dolly Strazar
Hon. John Waihee
Hon. Carolyn Boyce
Hon. Gail Bray
Hon. Edgar Malepeai
Peter Richardson
Willie Barrow
Margaret Blackshere
Joseph Cari
Hon. Cardiss Collins
Maria Garcia
Hon. Constance Howard
Hon. Thomas Hynes
Hon. Emil Jones
Thomas Lakin
Hon. Michael Madigan
Hon. Iris Martinez
Hon. John Rednour
Edward Smith
Phoebe Crane
Cordelia Lewis Burks
Robert Pastrick
Mary Lou Terrell
Kipper Tew
Terry Thurman
Hon. Chet Culver
Gordon Fischer
Hon. Michael Fitzgerald
Pat Marshall
Hon. Tom Miller
Hon. Sally Pederson
Ken Rains
Julianne Thomas
Hon. Tom Vilsack
Chris Gallaway
Lawrence Gates
Teresa Krusor
Larry Tenopir
Constance Wray
Moretta Bosley
Bill Garmer
Terry McBrayer
Kerry Morgan
Jo Etta Wickliffe
Patsy Arceneaux
Hon. John Breaux
Hon. Renee Gill Pratt
Jerry McKernan
Mike Skinner
Mary Lou Winters
Dorothy Melanson
William Bryan
David Garrity
Hon. Dale McCormick
Gwethalyn Phillips
Thomas Buffenbarger
Alvaro Cifuentes
Maria Cordone
Hon. Elijah Cummings
John Gage
Janice Griffin
Hon. Sue Hecht
Weldon Latham
Hon. Isiah "Ike" Leggett
Belkis (Bel) Leong-Hong
Richard Michalski
Glenard Middleton
Hon. Thomas "Mike" Miller
Mary Jo Neville
R. Scott Pastrick
Hon. Gregory Pecoraro
Carol Pensky
Michael Steed
John Sweeney
Beatrice Tignor
Susan Turnbull
Philip Johnston
Virginia Allan
Clinton Bench
Hon. Raymond Jordan
Elaine Kamarck
Hon. William Keating
Debra Kozikowski
David O'Brien
James Roosevelt
Alan Solomont
Margaret Xifaras
Mark Brewer
Arthenia Abbott
Lu Battaglieri
Elizabeth Bunn
Debbie Dingell
Joel Ferguson
Melvin "Butch" Hollowell
Hon. Kwame Kilpatrick
Joyce Lalonde
Hon. Christina Montague
Erin Parsons-Wright
Jeffrey Radjewski
Virgie Rollins
Richard Shoemaker
Jim Sype
Richard Wiener
Tarryl Clark
Mike Erlandson
Ken Foxworth
Greg Knutson
Sarah Lewerenz
Jackie Stevenson
Hon. Harvey Johnson
Johnnie Patton
Carnelia Pettis Fondren
Hon. William Wheeler
Doug Brooks
Mark Bryant
Joe Carmichael
Hon. Sharon Carpenter
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver
Sandra Querry
Hon. May Scheve Reardon
Hon. Bob Ream
Carol Juneau
Jean Lemire Dahlman
Hon. Ed Tinsley
Steven Achelpohl
Bill Avery
Kathleen Fahey
Cynthia LaMere
Frank LaMere
Hon. Yvonne Gates
Steven Horsford
Adriana Martinez
Hon. Dina Titus
Brian Wallace
Kathleen Sullivan
Hon. Raymond Buckley
Gaetan DiGangi
Anita Freedman
Mario Baeza
Tonio Burgos
Hon. Joseph Cryan
Alfred DeCotiis
Hon. June Fischer
Hon. Douglas Palmer
Hon. Joseph Roberts
Christine "Roz" Samuels
Hon. Bonnie Watson Coleman
George "Jeep" Gilliland
Mary Gail Gwaltney
Hon. Patricia Madrid
Gloria Nieto
Bill Richardson
Annadelle Sanchez
John Wertheim
Donald Afflick
Hon. Dominic Baranello
Eugene Callendar
Hon. Vivian Cook
Hon. Inez Dickens
Hon. Herman Farrell
Emily Giske
Hon. Judith Hope
Denise King
Maria Luna
Hon. Thomas Manton
Dennis Mehiel
Hon. Clarence Norman
Hon. Roberto Ramirez
Hon. Marguerite Relin
Jeffrey Soref
Marianne Spraggins
Irene Stein
Sylvia Tokasz
Randi Weingarten
Maureen White
Robert Zimmerman
Barbara Allen
Jeanette Council
Hon. Joycelyn Johnson
Jerry Meek
Muriel Offerman
David Parker
Everett Ward
Tom Dickson
Hon. Jim Maxson
Renee Pfenning
Mary Wakefield
Denny White
William Burga
Hon. Jane Campbell
Enid Goubeaux
Lloyd Mahaffey
Hon. Mark Mallory
Ronald Malone
Hon. Rhine McLin
Patricia Moss
Hon. Stephanie Tubbs Jones
Hon. Mary Ellen Withrow
Jay Parmley
Jim Frasier
Debbe Leftwich
Betty McElderry
Mary Botkin
Hon. Kate Brown
Jim Edmunson
Wayne Kinney
Gail Rasmussen
Meredith Wood Smith
Rena Baumgartner
Anna Burger
Carol Ann Campbell
Hon. Ronald Donatucci
William George
John Karoly
Leon Lynch
Hon. Sophie Masloff
Gerald McEntee
Hon. Jean Milko
Ian Murray
Evelyn Richardson
Hon. T.J. Rooney
Hon. Ruth Rudy
Patricia Scarcelli
C. Delores Tucker
Hon. Roberto Prats
Celita Arroyo de Roques
Hon. Kenneth McClintock
Hon. Charles Fogarty
William Lynch
Edna O'Neill Mattson
Edward McElroy
Hon. Frank Montanaro
Hon. Eleanor Slater
Mark Weiner
Hon. Gilda Cobb-Hunter
Joe Erwin
Donald Fowler
Waring Howe
Carol Khare
Bernice Scott
Hon. Thomas Daschle
Judy Olson Duhamel
Dennis Langley
Hon. Nick Nemec
Sharon Stroschein
Randy Button
Will Cheek
Inez Crutchfield
Hon. Lois DeBerry
Jimmie Farris
Hon. Myron Lowery
Hon. William Owen
Charles Soechting
Linda Chavez-Thompson
Blanche Darley
Hon. Yvonne Davis
Hon. Al Edwards
Jaime Gonzalez
Gabrielle Hadnot
David Holmes
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson
Hon. Ron Kirk
Hon. Iris Lawrence
Sue Lovell
Hon. Ed Miller
Hon. Carroll Robinson
Bob Slagle
Hon. Oscar Soliz
Rosa Walker
Donald Dunn
Jim Humlicek
Mary Palley
Nancy Jane Woodside
Scudder Parker
Linda Almy
Deb Markowitz
Chuck Ross
Allison Sultan
Carmen Gonzalez
Maria "Chi-Chi" Heywood
Derek Hodge
Hon. James O'Bryan
Hon. Kerry Donley
Barbara Easterling
Hon. Alexis Herman
Hon. Jerrauld Jones
Miguel Lausell
Daniel LeBlanc
Terence McAuliffe
Jennifer McClellan
Mame Reiley
Susan Swecker
Paul Berendt
Charlotte Coker
Ed Cote
Hon. Gary Locke
Karen Marchioro
David McDonald
Hon. Ron Sims
Ya-Yue Van
Jim Bowen
Nick Casey
Alice Germond
Emilie Holroyd
Marie Prezioso
Linda Honold
Stan Gruszynski
Ken Opin
Mary Rasmussen
Tim Sullivan
Paula Zellner
Hon. Mike Gierau
Hon. George Bagby
Nancy Drummond
Vickie Goodwin
Rachelle Valladares
Peter Alegi
Robert Bell
Lois Grjebine
Christine Schon Marques
John McCreery
Ruth McCreery
Ronald Schlundt
|
Montgomery, AL
Decatur, AL
Montgomery, AL
Mobile, AL
Montgomery, AL
Anchorage, AK
Fairbanks, AK
Wasilla, AK
Juneau, AK
Pago Pago, AS
Pago Pago, AS
Pago Pago, AS
Pago Pago, AS
Tucson, AZ
Paradise Valley, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Mesa, AZ
Tuscon, AZ
N. Little Rock, AR
N. Little Rock, AR
Fayetteville, AR
Arkadelphia, AR
Little Rock, AR
Long Beach, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Little River, CA
San Francisco, CA
Marina Del Ray, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Washington, DC
Venice, CA
Paramount, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Washington, DC
Sacramento, CA
Rancho Murieta, CA
San Francisco, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Chico, CA
Sacramento, CA
Walnut Grove, CA
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Carson, CA
Los Angeles, CA
San Jose, CA
San Francisco, CA
Pomona, CA
Sacramento, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Los Angeles, CA
Sacramento, CA
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Arvada, CO
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Denver, CO
Hartford, CT
Milford, CT
West Haven, CT
Stamford, CT
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Colchester, CT
Middle Haddam, CT
Wilmington, DE
Milton, DE
Greenville, DE
Magnolia, DE
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Tallahassee, FL
South Bay, FL
Tallahassee, FL
Tampa, FL
Jacksonville, FL
Plantation, FL
DeLand, FL
Tamarac, FL
Naples, FL
Key Biscayne, FL
Washington, DC
Southwest Ranches, FL
Gainesville, GA
Kennesaw, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Marietta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Piti, GU
Barrigada, GU
Hagatna, GU
Barrigada, GU
Honolulu, HI
Wailuku, HI
Hilo, HI
Honolulu, HI
Boise, ID
Boise, ID
Pocatello, ID
Boise, ID
Chicago, IL
Niles, IL
Chicago, IL
Alexandria, VA
Aurora, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Wood River, IL
Springfield, IL
Chicago, IL
DuQuoin, IL
Springfield, IL
Whitestown, IN
Indianapolis, IN
E. Chicago, IN
Vincennes, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Des Moines, IA
Des Moines, IA
Des Moines, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Des Moines, IA
Des Moines, IA
Des Moines, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
Des Moines, IA
Alexandria, VA
Overland Park, KS
Winfield, KS
Topeka, KS
Louisburg, KS
Owensboro, KY
Frankfort, KY
Lexington, KY
Bowling Green, KY
Harrodsburg, KY
Baton Rouge, LA
Washington, DC
New Orleans, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Metarie, LA
Falmouth, ME
Bowdoinham, ME
Portland, ME
Augusta, ME
Bangor, ME
Brookeville, MD
Washington, DC
Upper Marlboro, MD
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Arlington, VA
Frederick, MD
Washington, DC
Annapolis, MD
Gaithersburg, MD
Upper Marlboro, MD
Baltimore, MD
Clinton, MD
Dayton, MD
Washington, DC
Westminster, MD
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Upper Malboro, MD
Bethesda, MD
Boston, MA
Hull, MA
Swampscott, MA
Springfield, MA
New York, NY
Sharon, MA
Chicopee, MA
Concord, MA
Cambridge, MA
Newton, MA
Marion, MA
Clinton Twp., MI
Lansing, MI
E. Lansing, MI
Detroit, MI
Dearborn, MI
Lansing, MI
Detroit, MI
Detroit, MI
Eastpointe, MI
Ann Arbor, MI
Lansing, MI
Chesterfield Twp., MI
Detroit, MI
Detroit, MI
Okemos, MI
Lansing, MI
St. Paul, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Grove City, MN
Duluth, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Jackson, MS
Jackson, MS
Oxford, MS
Golden, MS
Joplin, MO
Kansas City, MO
Springfield, MO
St. Louis, MO
Kansas City, MO
Lee's Summit, MO
St. Louis, MO
Helena, MT
Browning, MT
Forsyth, MT
Helena, MT
Omaha, NE
Lincoln, NE
Omaha, NE
S. Sioux City, NE
S. Sioux City, NE
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Gardnerville, NV
Manchester, NH
Manchester, NH
Merrimack, NH
Portsmouth, NH
Englewood, NJ
New York, NY
Union, NJ
Teaneck, NJ
Scotch Plains, NJ
Trenton, NJ
Camden, NJ
Montclair, NJ
Trenton, NJ
Albuquerque, NM
Las Cruces, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Santa Fe, NM
Santa Fe, NM
Espanola, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Bronx, NY
Blue Point, NY
New York, NY
Jamaica, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
East Hampton, NY
Chatham, NY
New York, NY
Astoria, NY
New York, NY
Brooklyn, NY
New York, NY
Rochester, NY
New York, NY
Atlanta, GA
Ithaca, NY
Depew, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Great Neck, NY
Raleigh, NC
Fayetteville, NC
Winston-Salem, NC
Raleigh, NC
Cary, NC
Statesville, NC
Wake Forest, NC
Bismark, ND
Minot, ND
Bismarck, ND
Grand Forks, ND
Columbus, OH
Columbus, OH
Cleveland, OH
Greenville, OH
Maumee, OH
Columbus, OH
Columbus, OH
Dayton, OH
Columbus, OH
Cleveland, OH
Bethesda, MD
Norman, OK
Tulsa, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Purcell, OK
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Eugene, OR
LaGrande, OR
Eagle Point, OR
Portland, OR
Kunkletown, PA
Washington, DC
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Harrisburg, PA
Allentown, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Washington, DC
Pittsburgh, PA
Erie, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
Harrisburg, PA
Centre Hall, PA
Washington, DC
Silver Spring, MD
San Juan, PR
San Juan, PR
Cidra, PR
Harmony, RI
Pawtucket, RI
N. Kingstown, RI
Washington, DC
Cranston, RI
East Greenwich, RI
Cranston, RI
Orangeburg, SC
Greenville, SC
Columbia, SC
Charleston, SC
Columbia, SC
Gadsen, SC
Washington, DC
Rapid City, SD
Rapid City, SD
Holabird, SD
Mansfield, SD
Kingston, TN
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Memphis, TN
Memphis, TN
Knoxville, TN
Austin, TX
Washington, DC
El Paso, TX
Dallas, TX
Houston, TX
McAllen, TX
Houston, TX
Austin, TX
Washington, DC
Dallas, TX
Amarillo, TX
Houston, TX
Texarkana, TX
Houston, TX
Sherman, TX
Corpus Christi, TX
Austin, TX
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Logan, UT
Provo, UT
Montpelier, VT
Underhill Center, VT
Montpelier, VT
Hinesburg, VT
Montpelier, VT
St. Croix, VI
St. Croix, VI
St. Thomas, VI
St. Thomas, VI
Alexandria, VA
Alexandria, VA
Washington, DC
Norfolk, VA
Washington, DC
Richmond, VA
Washington, DC
Richmond, VA
Alexandria, VA
Richmond, VA
Seattle, WA
Spokane, WA
Vancouver, WA
Olympia, WA
Bellevue, WA
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Indianapolis, IN
Charleston, WV
Charleston, WV
Washington, DC
Princeton, WV
Charleston, WV
Milwaukee, WI
Green Bay, WI
Madison, WI
Boyceville, WI
Verona, WI
Shawano, WI
Jackson, WY
Rawlins, WY
Sheridan, WY
Douglas, WY
United Kingdom
Italy
Canada
France
Switzerland
Japan
Japan
Armed Forces Abroad |
Posted at 12:14 am by blog swarm
Political News Permalink
|
|