Blogswarm - Online Political News Magazine



Thursday, May 25, 2006
Tester has the momentum

Did Morrison's cash dry up at the same time Tester surged in donations? Did Tester outraise Morrison? Wow!

Posted at 04:48 pm by blogswarm
Comments (5)  




Tuesday, May 23, 2006
DFA Endorses Ned Lamont

I just received an email from Jim Dean letting me know that Democracy for America is supporting Ned Lamont. The headline: Joe Lieberman: George Bush's favorite Democrat?

For years, Joe Lieberman has supported President Bush on issue after issue. He supported Bush's crusade to dismantle Social Security and he folded on the nominations of Justices Roberts and Alito. Lieberman voted for the invasion of Iraq and he continues to stand in the way of real solutions that will bring our troops home. He has even supported attempts to label criticism of the war as unpatriotic. Last winter, he said, "It is time for Democrats who distrust President Bush to acknowledge that he will be Commander-in-Chief for three more critical years, and that in matters of war we undermine Presidential credibility at our nation's peril."

On Friday, Connecticut Democrats said, "Enough." The Connecticut Democratic Convention was the first opportunity for an open vote between Joe Lieberman and upstart challenger Ned Lamont. With the process heavily stacked toward insiders, Lamont was expected to collect just a handful of votes. Instead, he shocked the establishment and won more than twice the number of votes he needed to qualify for the August primary ballot.

Ned Lamont has won the support of DFA members across Connecticut and now he's won a place on the ballot to challenge Joe Lieberman. When he's elected in November, Ned will oppose the Bush administration's misguided policies and he'll stand with other Democrats for clean government, universal healthcare, and a moral foreign policy. I urge you to join me in supporting Ned Lamont today:

www.democracyforamerica.com/nedlamont

Joe Lieberman has won strong support from Republicans. Vice President Cheney calls him "a fine U.S. Senator." Republican Congressman Chris Shays and Fox News Commentator Sean Hannity have both endorsed him. Even President Bush loves Lieberman—there are rumors he has been considered for a post in Bush's cabinet. Is that the kind of Democrat that we want in Washington?

Ned Lamont won't have any Washington Republicans fighting for him. He's only going to win through thousands of grassroots donations from DFA members like you. We need to show Ned that the grassroots will stand with him. With your help, our goal is to raise $25,000 from 500 donors today. Can you make a donation of $100, $50, or even $25 to make it happen?

www.democracyforamerica.com/nedlamont

Ned will be a progressive voice in the Senate. He'll speak out against the destructive Bush administration policies that threaten our moral and economic future, our civil liberties, and our nation's security. He has opposed the Iraq War since the beginning and he'll advocate a new direction in Iraq. Let's make it happen.

The official statement reads:

Today, Democracy For America enthusiastically endorsed Ned Lamont in his run for United States Senate against incumbent Joseph Lieberman. Lamont surprised the pundits and Senator Lieberman with a strong showing at the Connecticut Democratic Party Convention on Friday and earned a spot on the primary ballot. The primary will be August 8.

“Ned Lamont has been loud and clear about America’s position in Iraq and world affairs, one of the most important concerns for voters,” said Jim Dean, Chair for Democracy for America. “Senator Lieberman has been a broken record supporting broken policies.”

Democracy for America will help raise money, media, and volunteers for Lamont’s campaign from across the nation.

Indeed. Tim says, "If you haven’t already, sign-up with the campaign. Folks, this is what a movement looks like."

Expect more whinning from the DLC...


Posted at 11:26 am by blogswarm
Comments (2)  




Monday, May 22, 2006
Jon Tester has the Momentum

A blogger lit dropped in John Morrison's neighborhood...

I just got back from volunteering for Jon Tester. Lit drops are nice because they’re quick. One of the reasons they’re not as great as other forms of field work, though, is the limited voter contact. As a result, few direct conversations with voters happen.

Still, things looked good today. The neighborhood where I was had more than twice as many Tester lawn signs for every Morrison sign. I had several people hand my lit back because they had either already voted for Tester or knew they would be and they wanted me to spread the word to someone who was still undecided.

One man came running out of his house after he saw what I’d left in his door, asked for two yard signs, made a contribution, and then told me that he was glad to finally see an honest man running for office.

A few houses later, a woman gardening told me that she had grown up in Havre and that she trusted “a good hi-line boy” like Tester to do right by Montana just like the Governor is. She also took a sign (even better, she’s on a corner house) after telling me that she had already voted for Jon and that her friends were all doing the same.

A couple blocks down the road, a highway patrol officer working in his garage told me to keep the literature, that he knew Jon, and that everyone in the house was already voting for him.

His neighbors don't think too kindly upon the womanizer.

Posted at 11:41 pm by blogswarm
Comments (2)  




Sunday, May 21, 2006
Joe Lieberman is in Serious Trouble

Via Kos (who is in Connecticut again today) here is what Kevin Rennie wrote for today'sHartford Courant:

The Lieberman people seemed dispirited all night. His demonstrators waved and rubbed together curious-looking wiener-shaped balloons advising "Stick With Joe" as they made their way through the aisles in a short, obligatory demonstration to the tune of "Still the One." They became animated only when "Soul Man" came over the sound system, providing a cover to stop chanting and start dancing.

Discomfort turned to pain for the Lieberman campaign when the first town in the 1st Congressional District began the roll call: Barkhamsted cast its two votes for Lamont. The challenger received votes in town after town, sometimes one at a time, sometimes considerably more. When once Lieberman-friendly Windsor cast 13 of its 17 votes for Lamont, a roar of surprise filled the hall. Lamont would sail past the crucial 15 percent threshold before reaching his 4th Congressional District stronghold. Lieberman ought to be grateful it was not a secret ballot. If it had been, some of the 100 missing delegates might have found the backbone to vote.

Delegation leaders revealed more than they may have intended with the tributes to home that preceded the casting of votes. East Haddam reminded the crowd that it's Dodd's hometown and then cast three of its five votes for Lamont. Lebanon announced that it's Dodd's birthplace and tossed three of its four votes for Lamont. If anyone thinks saving the sub base (and one can't fail to mention 30,000 jobs) will rescue Lieberman in southeastern Connecticut, take a look at the roll call. Yes, Groton went for Lieberman 9-4, but neighboring New London stuck the shiv in with six of 11 for Lamont.

The darkest omens for Lieberman came near the end of the night when Southbury, nearly the last to vote, announced it was still waiting for a response to a winter invitation to Lieberman to meet. Until he does, Southbury cast five votes for Lamont, three abstentions and zero for Lieberman. One of the night's loudest cheers rang out.

Ned Lamont's campaign is for real:

By now, the Lieberman crowd was beaten, even with 65 percent of the vote. A curiosity in January, the Lamont campaign has become a growing army that could overthrow the incumbent in the Aug. 8 primary. For 90 minutes, party loyalists who have known Joe Lieberman for decades rose and turned their backs on him in favor of an engaging stranger.

The proceedings ended with the crowd ignoring another state party icon. When U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, bounced onto the stage to accept the nomination on Lieberman's behalf, the crowd beat a retreat to the hospitality tents outside. DeLauro addressed the backs of heads while history marched on to the state's first primary challenge of an incumbent U.S. senator.

It IS fun being on the right side of history.


Posted at 11:34 am by blogswarm
Comment (1)  




Saturday, May 20, 2006
Joe Lieberman to leave Democratic Party?


Posted at 01:02 pm by blogswarm
Make a comment  




Friday, May 19, 2006
Democrats behaving like a movement

From coverage of a Sirota speech:

In the Q&A, Sirota said one of the most important things I think we all need to hear. "We're starting to behave like a movement." I think sometimes we don't give ourselves enough credit for what we're all helping to build. We're in year 3 or 4 of what was a 40 year movement for Republicans to get themselves where they are today. And they don't have the benefit of competency on their side. Behaving like a movement isn't only about building progressive idea factories and media machines. It's about sending messages to incumbents that they can't damage the ideological brand and still remain unchallenged. Sirota made a nice parallel between the Lamont campaign and 2004's Pat Toomey-Arlen Specter primary. That primary wasn't only for Specter, but all the other "moderates" in the Republican Party, a message that they will face the same difficulties if they step out of line. We're not there yet with our internal primary battles, but we are starting to push a movement politics instead of a party politics.

Also, there is a new blog that will have updates on all of the liveblogging going on tonight at the Connecticut Democratic Party Convention.


Livebloggers include:

LamontBlog will be liveblogging from afar, and Tim Tagaris will be liveblogging from the floor of the convention. Other bloggers that will be there include: Matt Stoller from MyDD, ConnecticutBlog, My Left Nutmeg, ConnecticutBob, Without A Purpose, CTBlue, Connecticut Local Politics, and La Resistance.

Get the popcorn ready!

Posted at 12:22 pm by blogswarm
Make a comment  

Jon Tester's Health Care Plans

Newly released:

These four principles guide my health care policy:

  • I support affordable health care for all Montanans and Americans
  • We must ensure families have choice in doctors and plans
  • We must control costs of health care
  • We must use more preventive care to improve health and control costs

In the 2005 Montana Legislature, here’s what we did:

  • Passed a comprehensive prescription drug program that provides more prescription drug coverage to Montana seniors – Big Sky Rx. We took on the big pharmaceutical companies and created a good program that benefits Montanans. I worked closely with AARP to pass this legislation and enact one of the most comprehensive state prescription drug programs in the country.
  • We fully funded the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
  • We provided tax credits and pooling to small business to provide health insurance to their employees. We worked with State Auditor John Morrison, Governor Brian Schweitzer and Democrats and Republicans in the 2005 Montana Legislature to pass this measure to help small business across the state.
  • In 2005 we increased provider rates to improve health care accessibility.

I will take that leadership to the federal level. Here is what I plan to do in the U.S. Senate:

    • We must fix the Medicare Prescription Drug Program
    • Simplify the Medicare Prescription Drug Program so seniors can make wise choices

      –We should allow Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices to cut drug costs

      –Provide more federal resources so counselors can help seniors with the complicated program

    • I intend to expand the successful Children’s Health Insurance Program to all children under 18. This federal-state program works.
    • I will staunchly protect Medicare, Medicaid, and the Indian Health Service from federal cuts.
    • As we did in Montana, we must provide tax credits to businesses that provide health care to workers.
    • We must invest in preventive care to improve health and control costs.
    • We must ensure state regulation of insurance because some, like Senator Conrad Burns, want to allow cuts in health care benefits to families and workers through federal control of health insurance.
    • We must invest in public health infrastructure because it is a first line of defense in health and our national security. The federal, state and local governments must work together to ensure a strong public health infrastructure.
    • Like Montana, we must ensure gender equity in insurance. That is why I asked the Montana Attorney General to rule on whether contraceptives for women must be covered under Montana health insurance plans. The Attorney General agreed. I will advocate for gender equity in insurance at the federal level as well.
Go Tester!


Posted at 12:18 pm by blogswarm
Comment (1)  




Thursday, May 18, 2006
CT Democratic Convention

Expectations:

Unsurprisingly, Joe Lieberman is trying to play the expectations game, making ridiculous, grandiose predictions that Ned Lamont will take 30% or or move of the delegates. To its credit, the Hartford Courant is aware of the shtick Joe is trying to pull, but I wouldn't be surprised if other tradmed outfits fall for this pathetically transparent gambit.

While it would be terrific if Lamont got 15%, and extraordinary if he did hit 30%, we need to be realistic here. Lieberman has been an institution in CT politics for decades. There is a tremendous amount of pressure to support him. Anyone interested in a future in Connecticut politics has to realize that if they back Lamont and Lamont loses, they'll be pariahs for as long as Lieberman is alive. Backing Joe is the safe move. Remember, we're talking about Democrats here - these are not the people who are usually inclined to ever take risks.

Could losing the convention vote be good news?

But there's also some very good news: Getting 15% doesn't matter. Not only does it not matter, it might even be salutary if Lamont doesn't hit that mark. No, I didn't just get fitted for rose-colored contact lenses. Here's why: Lamont has been working hard to get on the ballot via an alternate route: gathering signatures from 15,000 of the state's Democrats. It's an expensive and difficult process, but well worth it.

When you have to petition to get on the ballot, that does two things for you. First, you're forced to ramp up your field operation early. That means you've got a bigger volunteer base, more experienced campaign workers, and a field team that runs like a proverbial well-oiled machine months ahead of schedule. Second, you get the names of tons and tons of supporters. The law requires 15K sigs, but because of the inevitable challenges and invalid names, you generally want about twice that. And psychological research shows that the mere act of getting people to sign a statement of support (which is what a petition is) makes it much more likely that they'll continue in that support at a later time.

Successfully petitioning to get on the ballot would also be a nice feather in Lamont's cap because it would be the first time any major-party statewide candidate has done that in CT. Connecticut used to not have a petition process at all - you had to get 15% at a convention or you were out of luck. That system was recently ruled unconstitutional, so Lamont could make a little bit of history here.

Go read the whole thing.

Posted at 10:52 pm by blogswarm
Make a comment  




Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Lowell P. Weicker Jr Endorses Ned Lamont

Enough of Joe Lieberman:

The majority of Democrats say they support Sen. Joe Lieberman in spite of his backing the war, since Iraq, after all, is only one of many issues facing voters.

Hello! To characterize the most monumental screw-up of our times as "only one of many issues" is like admiring the theater marquees on Broadway with King Kong on the loose.

Iraq is a war based on falsehood for which thousands of young Americans have been killed and wounded. It is a policy mistake that has drained the life's blood of financial resources from all our endeavors here at home. It is the issue that shapes all other issues.

Ned Lamont has taken a clear stand on exiting this insanity. Sen. Joe Lieberman has made staying the course the cornerstone of his term. In his TV advertisements, Sen. Lieberman belatedly pleads for a civil dialogue on the war issue. How do you dialogue on a mistake based on a lie? A candid and wise man would have admitted his error and moved on in a new direction. Not so the incumbent senator.

Lieberman isn't wise enough to realize how stupid he is.

I want to see brave men and women stand up with Ned Lamont in the days ahead and say: Enough! We don't want to be cast in the image of President George W. Bush, of whom Sen. Lieberman is so enamored. America is better than the portrait painted by this Republican administration.

I speak as an independent who has seen the two-party system corrupt itself to the point of irrelevance during a dangerous time in our history. Ned Lamont can start the reform process by providing opposition to a Republican Party too long in power. What is needed is Ned Lamont's voice for health care for all, funding for our cities, and public education from kindergarten through college that works for our children.

He might be an underdog, but that only points to being outside a Democratic establishment that at the state and federal levels has failed miserably to uphold its end of the two-party system. [...]

Go, Ned! Give voice to what all of us feel so deeply: a return to an America of high ideals, reverence to the Constitution and concern for the frail. That is a patriotism sorely needed.

Great editorial.



Posted at 11:39 am by blogswarm
Make a comment  




Tuesday, May 16, 2006
NOW anti-Joe Lieberman

Devasting:

NOW PAC Endorses Ned Lamont for U.S. Senate in Connecticut

Statement of NOW PAC Officer Melody Drnach

The National Organization for Women Political Action Committee is pleased to announce its endorsement of Democratic candidate Ned Lamont for the United States Senate. The purpose of NOW PAC is to advance women's rights through electoral activity. NOW PAC is the only political action committee that bases its endorsements on a candidate's support of the full range of feminist issues, including (but not limited to):

  • Support for reproductive rights without restriction

  • Economic equality for women

  • Civil rights for all

  • Constitutional equality for women

  • Affirmative action

  • Elimination of violence against women.


Our endorsements go to the strongest feminist candidates. We listen to our membership and respond to their requests for action in races in their states. Therefore, pursuant to the request of Connecticut NOW, NOW PAC is endorsing Ned Lamont for the U.S. Senate.

Ned Lamont ardently supports a full range of reproductive choices for women. He certainly understands that reproductive justice includes full access for rape victims to emergency contraception. Ned Lamont recognizes that "civil rights for all" encompasses the right of everyone to marry the person they choose regardless of gender. He acknowledges that support of the continuing war in Iraq continues to decimate our economy and our standing in the world. Finally, Ned Lamont knows that allowing Samuel Alito's Supreme Court confirmation vote to proceed in the Senate has put Roe v. Wade in extreme jeopardy.

The stacking of the courts has emboldened those who wish to turn back all progress in the area of civil rights, privacy rights, and of course reproductive rights. The attack on Roe in South Dakota was predictable and a direct consequence of the confirmation of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court. The strategy to pack the courts with right-wing judges who are committed to overturning Roe is no secret. Yet, Senator Lieberman is one of seven Democrats who have promised not to filibuster any of President Bush's judicial nominees, except under "extraordinary circumstances." Well if packing the Supreme Court with abortion opponents like John Roberts and Samuel Alito is not an extraordinary circumstance, then we don't know what is.

These are precarious times for women. We cannot be satisfied with a senator who votes for women much of the time, or even most of the time. We need courageous leaders who will protect and advance all of our rights all of the time. The winner of this election will have profound influence on national policy which directly affects women and girls in Connecticut, in the nation and throughout the world. We are confident that we have found principled leadership in Ned Lamont and are proud to endorse his candidacy for U.S. Senate.

CTBlogger said:

It all started with Lieberman making this stupid statement.
Lieberman said he believes hospitals that refuse to give contraceptives to rape victims for "principled reasons" shouldn't be forced to do so.

"In Connecticut, it shouldn't take more than a short ride to get to another hospital," he said.
You're a class act Joe. I'm sure you're now regretting making that remark as the Connecticut chapter of the National Organization for Women will announce their endorsement of Ned Lamont today at 1 p.m.

Great news for Lamont and a major blow to Joe Lieberman's troubled campaign. This should give Delgates something to think about before Friday's convention vote.

Posted at 12:52 pm by blogswarm
Make a comment  




Next Page

Blog Swarm

The online news magazine "Democrat Blog Swarm" is your insider's guide to political news
If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:














Contact Me

<< January 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31




rss feed

Blogdrive